IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

heinerhummel@aol.com Wed, 12 February 2014 08:42 UTC

Return-Path: <heinerhummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA7E1A08C6 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:42:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.247
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.247 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_31=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id upb7yHGy90k4 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omr-m01.mx.aol.com (omr-m01.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.75]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674271A08BC for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtaomg-mcd02.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mcd02.mx.aol.com [172.26.223.208]) by omr-m01.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 8A309701E74CE; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:42:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from core-dqa002a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-dqa002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.211.197]) by mtaomg-mcd02.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 4B95D38000081; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:42:01 -0500 (EST)
References: <5B131180-FA93-4A05-B3BE-3A23767EBD9D@netapp.com> <5BB6C63B-4C53-4552-991D-AB50B2E66247@netapp.com> <CAPv4CP8bQSjEB5JJC1Q1go4b20878hvcsyap-HSquJV5KZAfNw@mail.gmail.com> <6E499501-18BB-49CE-ABC9-7820DE5F67B7@verisign.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1402041957250.23815@lakka.kapsi.fi> <483D4203-45F2-49D0-BB3B-4E1BA4D6F170@netapp.com> <8D0F021BE964AE4-B50-5B9C@webmail-m280.sysops.aol.com> <8D0F58B7E18D17E-918-2105B@webmail-vd016.sysops.aol.com> <001a01cf27c6$18aef200$4a0cd600$@huitema.net>
To: huitema@huitema.net, rrg@irtf.org
In-Reply-To: <001a01cf27c6$18aef200$4a0cd600$@huitema.net>
X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: heinerhummel@aol.com
X-MB-Message-Type: User
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D0F5E56E74665A_1B18_6277D_webmail-d166.sysops.aol.com"
X-Mailer: Webmail 38366-STANDARD
Received: from 178.26.195.50 by webmail-d166.sysops.aol.com (205.188.252.78) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:42:00 -0500
Message-Id: <8D0F5E56E6AE0F2-1B18-1A380@webmail-d166.sysops.aol.com>
X-Originating-IP: [178.26.195.50]
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 03:42:01 -0500
x-aol-global-disposition: G
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1392194521; bh=CHAQM0OHbJlLHu08po/FKMS9Dw5iLMvjWnaByMy7Trs=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tuHkP99L48/CZvHjMeqCA7hKEsqqE3TjjhDnYJQ8Ss31JfbrHg/Ynn1KB615PoLY7 WWvUlkbZOfZKaZWyO/hKRPhgtXddsGNtFAGGbWvtUPXVPKO8i4VzxoQFcTtXVRq/PA SETihEw2suCSMfnTVWnk8HFa/ND6w6bqRDUWFfrc=
x-aol-sid: 3039ac1adfd052fb33d95427
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 08:42:04 -0000

Thank you Christian, I have just subscribed successfully.
I do have some proposal to contribute which is not of RRG relevance.


"WHERE-awareness or not" however would be RRG relevant. But obviously, the alternative (which I like to call the DiffServ-mantra) shall prevail.
That fits to ILNP. That fits to making AS#s the leading part of IPv6 addresses. That will extend the fun with prefix building.
But no one should be wondering if IPv6 won't fly like an eagle (in spite of the IPv4 depletion issue).


Heiner



-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- 
Von: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
An: heinerhummel <heinerhummel@aol.com>; rrg <rrg@irtf.org>
Verschickt: Mi, 12 Feb 2014 8:43 am
Betreff: RE: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> Today people are demonstrating against what the NSA is doing persistently. see
> http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/aktionstag-the-day-we-fight-back-alle-gegen-goliath-1.1884738
>
> But what can I deduct from the silence on this list?

The IETF work on pervasive monitoring and its prevention is discussed in the 
"perpass" mailing list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass. Please 
feel free to join, participate, write drafts...

- -- Christian Huitema
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (MingW32)
Comment: Using gpg4o v3.2.34.4474 - http://www.gpg4o.de/
Charset: utf-8

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJS+yYUAAoJELba05IUOHVQREQIAKNqxc8Gr7qSbBbE8Q6waWi7
8Wj2LQjjsvgoWKSFk4vQTse4UB/3tuSXPPQF9dIj8xcf655vMBDvwd6hfofUtyFw
/sZnGFXZGX7xPGUE+z3uK/b1SqYMci39dHxajK5MwpwO++wMdrvvdMzZsHIHOwtn
Oav4ouS27wby/MdmvyduXeAAhKOLWllLcukcZuLsZRYemBXKnLcwNsF9Aguzl064
EkMS2hD38iC/ZjhHtKa96esyUso+tcF7yvKQYT84Njxs2mPF6hkTXt2OulXTljeq
1ykPYWTfArzlRfBZO9OHvRRgtXkPqw/xbacktn7DGEHvB50tjFm9Isdcpo+PclA=
=RM3i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email