Re: [rrg] Rerouting by readdressing
Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr> Tue, 13 November 2012 23:00 UTC
Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9AF021F84F1 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:00:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1i1VM9gimoZj for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:00:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com (mail-qa0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E507F21F845D for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id g24so1166238qab.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:00:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nfNahEuAa1Ll1+ljZhcQkG14EQDY6KO6cGuYwFOew8E=; b=VrY2lrIw+bEqC6TY9AuLMx/yU58/jJDjBTmayBLMuxr5lJbkmRHuG4+qkcL7ZJZCB7 oRETFPN1inqgwOSMrt88sCU2f0aJZgXwk2cxWpkwjH9LMXnCsFpYY7ed0Nhoq0C8Ys6a q2VvuiRRRWWLw03L+Qv7tjjzZJ9+/V0vvalTYsjc0rpjJKX6uEo0MmkmlibQC2s4VgD0 2oyS62cEl2qOcqiE8cQDAEo1GNUw/ydarvEP6XQ8OvQQIqVt3yiReAhjYIlOLBDkFi6M hCNvXdD/CO2fb19u0UaIvOI/n12gGASxei/Qg3pvinILcwrfPc08im+YgZZKrAhy7gLW pwvg==
Received: by 10.224.9.138 with SMTP id l10mr1169503qal.58.1352847605145; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:00:05 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dykim6@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.12.9 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:59:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-guGVC__4_xHbQoYOv1EUfSBU4VwOiCBA2GkMo25FM7h0VDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAP-guGVC__4_xHbQoYOv1EUfSBU4VwOiCBA2GkMo25FM7h0VDw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:59:45 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: okfaoL9ZGA9qBNr_LkGrVp6YOl0
Message-ID: <CAFgODJfMn21425RuFrDHMsyGFe+dJG=t67YVwxVNk+L_C9-xtw@mail.gmail.com>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec517ab7af0a0e804ce6860e3"
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rerouting by readdressing
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:00:06 -0000
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 8:30 AM, William Herrin <bill@herrin.us> wrote: > > What can we do if we don't care whether the endpoint has a stable > layer-3 address so long as it has some layer-3 address at any given > time? > Good point. A transport protocol which doesn't require a stable address should > work equally well on a network which does provide one and on a network > which does not. Maybe that's the way in. > Worth pursuing. The research we've done wants to lead us in a direction where the host > address isn't stable. I respectfully suggest we follow and see what > there is to be seen. > Will stay tuned. -- DY
- [rrg] Rerouting by readdressing William Herrin
- Re: [rrg] Rerouting by readdressing P S
- Re: [rrg] Rerouting by readdressing William Herrin
- Re: [rrg] Rerouting by readdressing Dae Young KIM