IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 25 February 2010 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AEA28C198 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:40:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ANK9iDac5BoM for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923DB28C1B1 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 15:40:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id E902E6BE5D8; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:42:50 -0500 (EST)
To: rrg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <20100225234250.E902E6BE5D8@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 18:42:50 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [rrg] draft-narten-radir-problem-statement-05.txt
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 23:40:40 -0000

    > From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>

    > I don't think there is anything in the data or technology that tells us
    > we will need a solution for 100 million or more.

I wouldn't believe any predictions - we just don't know enough (e.g. about
changing usage models) to make our long-term models worth a darn.

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email