Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com> Tue, 19 November 2013 17:38 UTC

Return-Path: <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65E61AE105 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:38:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i85kmXzg6qfQ for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:38:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7901AE0EA for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:38:27 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7fbd8e0000011cc-d0-528ba20b7f6a
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id E2.69.04556.B02AB825; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 18:38:19 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB109.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.126]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 12:38:18 -0500
From: Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Thread-Topic: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
Thread-Index: AQHO5S9bo0vElbAGd0SVhro/WnUq0JotG3SA//+zVGA=
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:38:18 +0000
Message-ID: <2F3EBB88EC3A454AAB08915FBF0B8C7E02EEBB2F@eusaamb109.ericsson.se>
References: <20131119135800.82F7518C126@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <62E077F0-FEAE-4CC1-BFF9-07D2F409340D@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <62E077F0-FEAE-4CC1-BFF9-07D2F409340D@tony.li>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.135]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrGLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrC73ou4gg4M3dS1uLlzHYrFoxVMW i/8d/WwOzB6TNx5m83h2bTujx8V9F5gCmKO4bFJSczLLUov07RK4MvpvbGItOM9VMbXzK1MD 4zGOLkZODgkBE4kZZy6wQthiEhfurWcDsYUEjjBKrN7q3cXIBWQvZ5ToevGDCSTBJqAj8e16 F3MXIweHiICrxK97xSBhZgFFiaWfN4CVCAuoSEz8cARspoiAqsTns0ehbCuJX/vegs1nAYof +3uOGcTmFfCVuDq/jRFib65EX0sr2BxOAWuJuTsug8UZgW77fmoNE8QucYlbT+YzQdwsILFk z3lmCFtU4uXjf1C/KEt8n/OIBaJeR2LB7k9sELa2xLKFr6H2CkqcnPmEZQKj2CwkY2chaZmF pGUWkpYFjCyrGDlKi1PLctONDDcxAuPmmASb4w7GBZ8sDzFKc7AoifN+eescJCSQnliSmp2a WpBaFF9UmpNafIiRiYNTqoExxlutc16c4YadPZtPurm6RkblsXtzsRbpxH94z/ot4bmXskDQ 5we7s5nMM4+7zpjxLaY40+3Koi2blfL87C121Mdu1Q7LvXLbVTLzU/ditvKfrPyNC7hqVwVs KJhg8vHaMvuHnfeeeb1IS2o736W+vcrG9ZMSl3px/FqFWT37dfbLPy+rE1FiKc5INNRiLipO BADYSg1BaQIAAA==
Cc: "rrg@irtf.org" <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:38:30 -0000

Perhaps, we could research why adoption of IPv6 is so slow and if it will ever happen at all.
Then we could use that insight to design IPv7 to be something to be more readily adopted.

--Jakob

-----Original Message-----
From: rrg [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Tony Li
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:02 AM
To: Noel Chiappa
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG


On Nov 19, 2013, at 5:58 AM, jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) wrote:

>> From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>;
> 
>> the IETF has said it doesn't want to come up with any more clever 
>> ways to help organizations continue to squeeze more life out of IPv4 
>> addresses. It will help with transition away from IPv4.
> 
> Just like with NAT. The IETF would rather stick its head in the ground 
> - thereby ensuring that whatever happens, it will be done by 
> individual actors, in an incoherent way.
> 
> Like the Bourbons, the IETF has learned nothing, and forgotten nothing.



Guys,

Can we please get back to program planning?

Again, we are looking for speakers to invite.  References to interesting routing papers and research would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Tony

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg