Re: [rrg] Rebuttal for RANGI//re: Reminder

Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com> Fri, 12 February 2010 10:08 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxh@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655C93A7893 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:08:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.477
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.477 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=2.122, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jheXIOgRtfzg for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7153A7899 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:08:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga01-in [172.24.2.3]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KXQ00H0747V27@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for rrg@irtf.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:09:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KXQ00F9547VSQ@szxga01-in.huawei.com> for rrg@irtf.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:09:31 +0800 (CST)
Received: from HUAWEIE75F8F11 ([10.111.13.9]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KXQ0023847UP9@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for rrg@irtf.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:09:31 +0800 (CST)
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:09:30 +0800
From: Xu Xiaohu <xuxh@huawei.com>
In-reply-to:
To: 'Tony Li' <tony.li@tony.li>, 'Lixia Zhang' <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
Message-id: <000001caabcb$77e77a10$090d6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Thread-index: AcqqmSAsFLBw3Qk+jEiq/IlI/4yR/wAVlhQgADbFvSA=
Cc: 'RRG' <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebuttal for RANGI//re: Reminder
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:08:16 -0000

Hi all,

I have updated the RANGI draft to -03 version. Any comment is welcomed.

Hi Tony, would you please update the RANGI reference in the recommendation draft?

Best wishes,
Xiaohu

> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Xu Xiaohu [mailto:xuxh@huawei.com]
> 发送时间: 2010年2月11日 16:14
> 收件人: 'Tony Li'; 'Lixia Zhang'
> 抄送: 'RRG'
> 主题: Rebuttal for RANGI//re: [rrg] Reminder
> 
> Hi Tony and Lixia,
> 
> The rebuttal for RANGI is as follows:
> 
> The reason why the ID->Locator lookup is separated from the FQDN->ID lookup
> is: 1) not all applications are tied to FQDNs, and 2) it seems not necessary
> to require all devices to possess a FQDN of their own. Basically RANGI uses
> DNS to realize the ID->Locator mapping system. If there are too many entries
> to be maintained by the authoritative servers of a given Administrative Domain
> (AD), Distribute Hash Table (DHT) technology can be used to make these
> authoritative servers scale better, e.g., the mappings maintained by a given
> AD will be distributed among a group of authoritative servers in a DHT fashion.
> As a result, the robustness feature of DHT is inherited naturally into the
> ID->Locator mapping system. Meanwhile, there is no trust issue since each AD
> authority runs its own DHT ring which maintains only its presidial mappings.
> 
> For host mobility, if communicating entities are RANGI nodes, the mobile node
> will notice the correspondence node of its new locator once its locator changes
> due to a mobility or re-homing event. Meanwhile, it should also update its
> locator information in the ID->Locator mapping system timely by using the
> Secure DNS Dynamic Update mechanism defined in [RFC3007]. In case of
> simultaneous mobility, at least one of them has to resort to the ID->Locator
> mapping system for resolving the correspondence node’s new locator so as to
> continue their communication. If the correspondence node is a legacy host,
> Transit Proxies, which play the similar function as the home-agents in Mobile
> IP, will relay the packets between the communicating parties.
> 
> RANGI uses proxies (e.g., Site Proxy and Transit Proxy) to deal with both legacy
> IPv6 and IPv4 sites. Since proxies function as RANGI hosts, they can handle
> Locator Update Notification messages sent from remote RANGI hosts (or even from
> remote RANGI proxies) correctly. Hence there is no edge-to-edge aliveness
> problem. Details will be specified in the latter version of RANGI-PROXY.
> 
> The intention that RANGI uses IPv4-embeded IPv6 addresses as locators is to
> reduce the total deployment cost of this new Internet architecture and to avoid
> renumbering the site internal routers when such a site changes ISPs.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Xiaohu
> ________________________________________
> 发件人: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] 代表 Tony Li
> 发送时间: 2010年2月11日 5:37
> 收件人: 'RRG'
> 主题: Re: [rrg] Reminder
> 
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Remember this?  I’ve seen one submission.  Are folks working on things?
> 
> Tony
> 
> ----------------
> Hi all,
> 
> We've had a bit of a schedule slip. We are still trying to hit a final document
> date of Mar. 8. That gives us just less than 7 weeks. The next deadline for
> a rebuttal is Feb. 9. The deadline for counterpoints will then be Mar. 2. This
> will give us a few days for final document prep.
> 
> The word count limit for the rebuttal is 500 words.
> 
> Regards,
> Tony