IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Terminology

HeinerHummel@aol.com Fri, 05 February 2010 08:00 UTC

Return-Path: <HeinerHummel@aol.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96103A6D15 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:00:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.96
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.638, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VMBpSJIBxpRW for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (imr-ma01.mx.aol.com [64.12.206.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E643A682C for <rrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 00:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from imo-da03.mx.aol.com (imo-da03.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.201]) by imr-ma01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o1580oOl013961; Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:00:51 -0500
Received: from HeinerHummel@aol.com by imo-da03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id o.d2d.5fa03c03 (34947); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:00:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com (smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.207.142]) by cia-da05.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILCIADA058-5c564b6bd0289; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:00:46 -0500
Received: from magic-d27.mail.aol.com (magic-d27.mail.aol.com [172.19.146.161]) by smtprly-ma03.mx.aol.com (v127.7) with ESMTP id MAILSMTPRLYMA034-5c564b6bd0289; Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:00:40 -0500
From: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Message-ID: <215eb.454128f7.389d2a28@aol.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:00:40 -0500
To: rw@firstpr.com.au, scott.brim@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_215eb.454128f7.389d2a28_boundary"
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021
X-AOL-ORIG-IP: 95.91.134.11
X-AOL-IP: 172.19.146.161
X-AOL-SENDER: HeinerHummel@aol.com
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [rrg] Terminology
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:00:32 -0000

 
In einer eMail vom 05.02.2010 04:53:19 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
rw@firstpr.com.au:

There  are other potential solutions to the scaling problem, such as
replacing BGP  and the DFZ with something which can happily handle
millions or billions of  mobile and non-mobile PI prefixes.  It so
happens that no-one has  proposed this - because everyone believes it
to be  impractical.



...but me :-)  
Heiner

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email