Re: [rrg] Fwd: Propose a new proposal

Sun Letong,
your proposal shows that the strong belief in mapping doesn't crumble at  
all. Speaking in analogy once more, I have tried - in vain - to convince 
people  that a routable namespace a la Manhattan, New York is better than using 
a  non-routable namespace where you depend on mapping. In New York you can 
progress  towards your destination without asking people at each junction of 
avenue and  street.

Besides that the scalability problem could indeed become a non-issue (for  
ever), it strikes me that    the inherent capabilities of  geographical 
coordinates-based routing wrt IP mobility aren't appreciated  neither by Nokia 
nor Ericsson folks.

Good luck for your proposal

Heiner

In einer eMail vom 13.12.2009 02:51:09 Westeuropäische Normalzeit schreibt  
charriesun@gmail.com:

Hello Lixia and all:

I'm a student in Tsinghua University, BeiJing and make  bold to submit a 
proposal for the current scalability problems of the  Internet. This is about 
a layered mapping system (perhaps we can call it  "LMS") to store and lookup 
mapping information of edge addresses and core  addresses in the separation 
base. It is similar to LISP+ALT while differs from  it in a number of ways. 
I made a elementary summary and introduced the design  in another document. 

Summary is here:       
(file:///C:%5CDOCUME%7E1%5Ccscg%5CLOCALS%7E1%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml) 
_http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AQsJc7A4NTgeZGM3Y3o1NzVfNmd3eGRzNGhi&hl=en_ 
(http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AQsJc7A4NTgeZGM3Y3o1NzVfNmd3eGRzNGhi&hl=en) 
Details:        
(file:///C:%5CDOCUME%7E1%5Ccscg%5CLOCALS%7E1%5CTemp%5Cmsohtml1%5C01%5Cclip_filelist.xml) 
_http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BwsJc7A4NTgeOTYzMjFlOGEtYzA4OC00NTM0LTg5ZjktNmFkYzBhNWJhMWEy&hl=en_ 
(http://docs.google.com/fileview?id=0BwsJc7A4NTgeOTYzMjFlOGEtYzA4OC00NTM0LTg5ZjktNmFkYzBhNWJhM
WEy&hl=en) 

My key idea is similar to the LISP+ALT in adopting a hierarchical mapping 
system to guarantee scalability. Initially i thought my proposal is just a 
specification of ALT, but later i realize there're some differences. I also 
made a comment on  today's proposals and my devised two-stage cache on the ITR 
can work for many proposals to enhance the performance.  My experiements 
haven't added to it but prelimenary results are satisfied.  Could you do me a 
favor to add this proposal to the rrg-wiki Active Proposal  list? You may 
have a look at it and discard it if it's not novel at all. I  apologize if it 
wastes rrg's time.  

Best wishes,
Sun Letong

_______________________________________________
rrg  mailing  list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg