Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Fri, 13 December 2013 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5CE1AE014 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CN_BODY_35=0.339, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6mSz6BBKgLsM for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:44:76:96:27:212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301B51ADFFE for <rrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.20]) by qmta14.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 13CQ1n0030S2fkCAE59Nqn; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:09:22 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.181.139.254]) by omta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 159L1n00Q5VX96D8V59Msp; Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:09:22 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0823D1FA@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 09:09:20 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27BB74BC-2243-4026-9DF3-FE72C7FD167A@tony.li>
References: <5B131180-FA93-4A05-B3BE-3A23767EBD9D@netapp.com> <CAPv4CP_xs0Ki4Ada-CrBQftwtSfWVEK8gxohKTHEMHAEHP9s_A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rcXJzOC=tTqbCUK7i7a62vbiEyC9UCWLi0XvsXv8fW4qQ@mail.gmail.com> <FD7BEAB9-F967-4788-BBCA-6E06FBE585A8@tony.li> <B3E59CCB-BA8B-4335-8610-4EF9A48B694E@riw.us> <CAPv4CP_6q3C-xMTPcNPMtgR6hEzfjQQE7sJmeCf0U415Gi=bNA@mail.gmail.com> <80D5BE49-FCB1-4A0F-A9EF-92E1E3218B01@tony.li> <85DD2176-0BE0-4A89-8BA4-B54F8F08955B@netapp.com> <CAEj5p9SUA8OKzm__LM2JfPxQ576oAwrByrqL9SihvkUta_kCPA@mail.gmail.com> <A1E7D052-11FB-40C1-9456-EFB7D5F47EF4@tony.li> <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE0823D1FA@NKGEML512-MBS.china.huawei.com>
To: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1386954562; bh=Q0p32j8AtmtYIptb098hoj22eNmaPmYV4V1aLxcSPvU=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=VVwZJqdzoJrd7zckLokL6L59iCBkBKpjZg8n+S0ipp9XmQ0TteY6nN2902OiO2d9+ eY1ZXIJKoNYGG1Ox1GdxRy8QCoUltDyuCfLqc7wVVwC3D3RR1AA8XwP1hXA3twjITQ VcUgQGoOxR/fmeBKjS9YKUAbSF8+x2aaG5sm3IrB4548pN3nulsSRBTpCviqZaSFXB wpqRGZvLHMQadcrlz5vO8fQ1Q95h8adjbiXCpk6VlhbG3vdWa0rj9fs2kH2ha3uyIe tdOEbEXd50C75jmIKpUSyAV8Zb2UQ/d9R3p9jKfiNjOvz6jN/8p0hz9t7fJTnuZeCO SYGZlxjGZuCKA==
Cc: "rrg@irtf.org" <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 17:09:33 -0000

Since this is already being discussed in IDR, I would think that is sufficient.

Tony


On Dec 13, 2013, at 1:13 AM, Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>; wrote:

> Hi, 
> 
> Is the performance-based routing an interesting topic? The following draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-xu-idr-performce-routing-00) describes an performance-based BGP routing paradigm. Somebody may look it as an abuse of BGP:) 
> 
> By the way, the following blog and the linked webinar might be helpful to understand the motivation for performance-based routing mechanism:
> http://blog.level3.com/level-3-network/network-performance-app-performance/
> 
> Best regards,
> Xiaohu
> 
>> -----邮件原件-----
>> 发件人: rrg [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] 代表 Tony Li
>> 发送时间: 2013年11月27日 16:59
>> 收件人: rrg@irtf.org
>> 主题: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Dear volunteers,
>> 
>> Thanks for offering to help out and contribute to the workshop program.
>> 
>> I'm very pleased to report that Dmitri Krioukov has tentatively agreed to
>> present.
>> 
>> Let's keep adding to the list.
>> 
>> So far, the topics that folks have mentioned look like:
>> 
>> 	- The intersection of naming and routing
>> 	- Problems with centralizing control planes
>> 	- Network programmability
>> 	- Routing in ICN (information-centric networking)
>> 	- Multi-layer routing
>> 	- SDN routing, including multi-domain SDN
>> 	- (Ab)use of BGP
>> 	- Mesh routing
>> 	- DTN routing
>> 	- Privacy
>> 	- Compact routing
>> 	- Routing for more generalized addressing
>> 	- Software defined Internet exchange
>> 
>> And some obvious sources of papers to pursue:
>> 	- ANRP
>> 	- Routing from SIGCOMM
>> 
>> For those of you have volunteered to help out, could you please:
>> 
>> 	- Add other topics to the lists above
>> 	- Add other specific authors that we should invite
>> 	- Reach out and invite speakers
>> 
>> We rely on your help to make this into a successful workshop.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tony
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rrg mailing list
>> rrg@irtf.org
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg