Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Wed, 20 November 2013 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A12C71AE09F for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:59:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8GPbbAQ27Jso for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179951AE004 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.92]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id rqlg1m0061zF43QA9szJmy; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:59:18 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.181.139.254]) by omta24.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id rszF1m00H5VX96D8kszGEo; Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:59:18 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <CAPv4CP-LZUcAz183iEXES8t3b5bwYiJu=SU9TwgZwNgjhTm=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 08:59:15 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8BB16CEB-362E-4441-A9B6-921A7E0066DC@tony.li>
References: <20131119135800.82F7518C126@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <62E077F0-FEAE-4CC1-BFF9-07D2F409340D@tony.li> <2F3EBB88EC3A454AAB08915FBF0B8C7E02EEBB2F@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> <4D0FD559-1207-4138-9C2B-4FC44D23FDCC@tony.li> <CA+b+ERmUuWZz7yjxRWLpcAtb1kcb+bCO7=Cjbf8ow3aAsb3p5g@mail.gmail.com> <5456CCF7-F16F-44A0-AC60-19BE72949D72@netapp.com> <CAPv4CP-LZUcAz183iEXES8t3b5bwYiJu=SU9TwgZwNgjhTm=PQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1384966758; bh=vP48GTGexffBEO/8jeCUDrR5z33w7rt9pH0BbIafeF8=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=okATyuGy5Ga+xfR2jZ3e65cJHx3/XYnROwm2uOKhfHqIOf8Roa9NSUz84kvc24zb8 id87bLB4BCmZRpmhbibKc9uCqf5SlY7R09pymqoRwJ9a3viPyh1A3cL8KzTxTVy9ly +jHDunAIrBdiWWyilMAUknE6v4jOkeIYgucIouZTL35a/u59eLIhWVe5Fzjo6x+xg6 Ek/K5Y4gBSyJj8guZul/AjNLeEhpjnwX+VTDfEU8HV2+dT6/hnhEGYmyCMQePRjLtV yWb+OESoSi0R9h+JuOw0JMmibaLpYenADnF0B0M2y/hLYp2DqnL47wWoSEG0c3NBL7 gNNUI920du4+g==
Cc: "rrg@irtf.org" <rrg@irtf.org>, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:59:28 -0000

On Nov 20, 2013, at 7:31 AM, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>; wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com>; wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> On 2013-11-20, at 4:31, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>; wrote:
>>> Reading RRG charter it is not clear to me if this group is tasked to
>>> improve IP routing
>> 
>> good question. My personal take is that part of the "rebooting" effort could lead to charter changes. So IMO, don't be limited by the current charter text, think broadly about routing topics related to current and future Internet technology/architecture.
> 
> My feeling is that there is interesting work going on at multiple
> layers and they can learn from each other.  If the first step is a
> workshop, I suggest diversity


Exactly.

Tony