Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Well, here in the lab we like to play with routes and names, so I'm interested :-)

Javier

El 15-11-2013, a las 12:24, Russ White <russw@riw.us> escribió:

> 
> Some things of interest might be the intersection of naming and routing, or the problems around centralizing control planes (though this might be more aligned with sdnrg). Maybe something around network programmability?
> 
> :-)
> 
> Russ
> 
> <><
> russw@riw.us
> Ericsson
> 
>> On Nov 15, 2013, at 2:49 AM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> We seem to have several volunteers who would be interested in helping.  That's great.  More are, of course welcome.
>> 
>> Lars has suggested that we form a program committee to organize this, and I concur.   
>> 
>> So, for folks that are interested: What papers would we like to see here?  What topics should we invite?  Who are researchers in the area who are doing interesting things?  Who has the contacts to approach them?
>> 
>> And should we take this discussion off-list so as to not annoy everyone?
>> 
>> Tony
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 14, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am also interested and would travel if feasible.
>>> 
>>> Alia
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd be very interested in participating (assuming I can afford the travel) so you have at least one participant. Let me know if you want my help organizing after you see all your volunteers.
>>> 
>>> Scott
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> the RRG has been awfully quiet for a while now. I'd like to see if we can reboot the group and bring in some new work. There is clearly interesting work happening in the routing research space; we handed out several ANRP prizes to routing papers over the last few years. How can we bring some of that research into the RRG?
>>> 
>>> To that end, I'd like to ask if people would be interested in organizing a session - either at the next IETF meeting or maybe co-located with a conference - where folks can bring some ongoing academic work, in order to see if there's enough momentum to carry the group forward.
>>> 
>>> If that sounds interesting, great. I hope if sounds interesting enough to some of you to volunteer to put in the cycles and organize said meeting. If that doesn't sounds interesting, I'm all ears on how else we can restart activities in the RRG. Or maybe it's time to close?
>>> 
>>> Lars
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> rrg@irtf.org
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> rrg@irtf.org
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rrg mailing list
>>> rrg@irtf.org
>>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rrg mailing list
>> rrg@irtf.org
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg