Re: [rrg] RANGI questions

Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Fri, 19 February 2010 14:19 UTC

Return-Path: <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA463A7CFB for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:19:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.949
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.949 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T8t4xO0fRCod for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:19:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F123A7DE7 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:19:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from virusscan.mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4D95AFF8; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:21:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB985AE78; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:21:29 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de
Received: from [132.187.12.151] (win3151.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.12.151]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B98025D7A0; Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:21:29 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B7E9E52.3080106@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 15:21:06 +0100
From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Organization: University of Wuerzburg
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
References: <4B7E9C23.3020308@firstpr.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4B7E9C23.3020308@firstpr.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] RANGI questions
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 14:19:45 -0000

Hi Robin,

just a quick and short response.

Robin Whittle schrieb:
> RANGI has an advantage over GLI-Split (msg06056) in that a host
> Identifier can be used on any host in the world - in any LD.  
> This appears
> to be impossible in GLI-Split, where an Identifier can only be used in a
> given GLI-domain (roughly equivalent to a site).  
>   
> A host could retain its
> Identifier as it moves to any access network - which it cannot in
> GLI-Split. 

What you say here is not true. The identifiers in GLI-Split are global 
and can retained when hosts move among GLI-domains. This is an essential 
feature of GLI-Split. We'll send you later a more detailed answer to 
your previous email.

Best wishes,

    Michael

-- 
Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor
University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science
Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206
phone: (+49)-931/31-86644 (new), fax: (+49)-931/31-86632 (new)
mailto:menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn