Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 05 December 2012 17:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C0121F8C14 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:32:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.445
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.445 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.154, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ES7e1z-0a8kG for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:32:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC16421F8C04 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 5 Dec 2012 09:32:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=344; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1354728755; x=1355938355; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=p+diGuOl0zCOQTDeO5/dJtd+Pc7GVcVBiOUG7++rSas=; b=bVo27R86WQNgT/Y2m41MLpvKLupoqqA9fu7l8NZT8cWut0NeNiy+MABV GOKAv7jVApJxxfkwL1+MR/aOzjWtPFhahGtV1qoa2FizM+XLUdUVgqBPb CXAyrbWoGA4+/AMFB2W0IFfE0+MnEgIDW0v8J/YxquM7RYYHaMpaCzkZp w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao0PAEOEv1CQ/khL/2dsb2JhbABEg0eCbbZoBAOBARZzgh4BAQEEI1UBEAsYAgIFFgsCAgkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQGIDK9EkxGBIo5DgRMDlgOQR4Jz
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6917"; a="10171345"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2012 17:32:32 +0000
Received: from dhcp-10-61-105-116.cisco.com (dhcp-10-61-105-116.cisco.com [10.61.105.116]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB5HWWeC007624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:32:32 GMT
Message-ID: <50BF8530.9010102@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 18:32:32 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
References: <20121112234012.05F8E18C0CA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAFgODJcP1zvwRJukJdnqjSR-78XAMB1nSxL32gjUQB+NqpgESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A18F75.8060001@joelhalpern.com> <CAFgODJcDAzaYPrWFEJhgeCjnN_M9tdd+pdHTiccd=Dz=1mYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <EC8FD781-E416-4AE6-BA99-F74FE2DDA14D@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com> <27E72BC2-C84D-469F-9667-7A749567B477@tony.li> <09cc01cdc173$71323cd0$5396b670$@huitema.net> <03E5ABD7-EA3C-4C69-B3F9-16C8B6C6E512@tony.li> <50BE3EEB.20700@internet2.edu> <F502F124-32EC-40B9-9C3F-4E2DF5337B62@tony.li> <0d9601cdd2c2$57d22290$077667b0$@huitema.net> <2C77A48B-9A7D-4E02-B4F3-987E0AFC83F8@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <2C77A48B-9A7D-4E02-B4F3-987E0AFC83F8@tony.li>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2012 17:32:36 -0000

Tony,

On 12/5/12 6:09 PM, Tony Li wrote:
> Should apps have to know that the infrastructure has changed and that the active interface now has a different L3 name?

Applications may have cached state that needs to be invalidated (a good
example is DNS caching), but I don't know that this in particular
invalidates your point.

Eliot