IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Mon, 14 December 2009 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271393A689E for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:21:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.39
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.39 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.209, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y0xaIL4ZJVVn for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.27.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481FB3A6A22 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.90]) by QMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id H46A1d0051wfjNsAB4J7Qd; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:18:07 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([24.6.155.154]) by OMTA23.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id H4NK1d0083L8a8Q8j4NLHu; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:22:22 +0000
Message-ID: <4B26660E.5020109@tony.li>
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 08:21:34 -0800
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
References: <5976B445-7209-4DE5-9D83-E2920265EB27@CS.UCLA.EDU> <5bc37fd40912110555qf59abdcu7fa1c514774649c3@mail.gmail.com> <4B2578CC.1020105@firstpr.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <4B2578CC.1020105@firstpr.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:21:56 -0000

Robin Whittle wrote:
> Short version:   The RRG Design Goals document cold be used as the
>                  basis for a "template", but was based on very
>                  little discussion and AFAIK has not achieved
>                  consensus.


Robin,

When the discussion of the design goals slowed, we judged that to 
indicate rough consensus.


> 
>                  I suggest that concise summaries mention how
>                  suitable the proposal is for voluntary adoption in
>                  IPv4 and IPv6 - perhaps with reference to this list
>                  of constraints:
> 
>               http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/RRG-2009/constraints/


While you're more than welcome to do so, this is not a requirement.

Tony

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status