Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 15 December 2009 09:47 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5CB73A67CF for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:47:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HGcjNYaa3PLA for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:47:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.80]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147473A6980 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:47:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OMTA20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.87]) by QMTA08.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HMla1d0071smiN4A8Mmx5K; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:46:57 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.110] ([24.6.155.154]) by OMTA20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id HMmw1d0043L8a8Q8gMmwuV; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:46:57 +0000
Message-ID: <4B275B0E.3060309@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 01:46:54 -0800
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <5976B445-7209-4DE5-9D83-E2920265EB27@CS.UCLA.EDU> <5bc37fd40912110555qf59abdcu7fa1c514774649c3@mail.gmail.com> <4B2578CC.1020105@firstpr.com.au> <4B26660E.5020109@tony.li> <BAF9298C-4167-4D3C-891F-4F0710EB441A@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <BAF9298C-4167-4D3C-891F-4F0710EB441A@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>
Subject: Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:47:11 -0000

Lixia Zhang wrote:
> 
> On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Tony Li wrote:
> 
>> Robin Whittle wrote:
>>> Short version:   The RRG Design Goals document cold be used as the
>>>                 basis for a "template", but was based on very
>>>                 little discussion and AFAIK has not achieved
>>>                 consensus.
>>
>>
>> Robin,
>>
>> When the discussion of the design goals slowed, we judged that to 
>> indicate rough consensus.
> 
> (no hat) consensus should be explicitly solicited, rather than 
> implicitly assumed.


Fair.  In any case, we intentionally left the document open as it was 
subject to further revisions.

Further, it's not clear that the status of the document is really 
relevant to the discussion at hand.  Folks are welcome to use it if they 
want.

Tony