Re: [rrg] Terminology

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Thu, 04 February 2010 03:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73103A6767 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:30:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HfvSzfFLMTwp for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:30:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265223A687C for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:30:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id AD8EE6BE5E1; Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:31:34 -0500 (EST)
To: rrg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <20100204033134.AD8EE6BE5E1@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:31:34 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [rrg] Terminology
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:30:51 -0000

Someone pointed out to me that although I've been using the terms CEE and CES
as synonomous for the terms 'host-centric' and 'edge-centric' (and
'network-centric' completes the list), that for others they seemingly aren't
exactly synonomous, but subtly different.

Can someone confirm this, and explain what the differences are?

I'll be using 'host-centric', etc from now on. My apologies if I have
inadvertently caused any confusion by using them as synonyms for 'host-centric'
and 'edge-centric'.

	Noel