Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
"George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com> Wed, 14 November 2012 00:17 UTC
Return-Path: <wesley.george@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2872521F859E for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:17:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.498
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.498 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-JNiVg9IE8Q for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cdpipgw02.twcable.com (cdpipgw02.twcable.com [165.237.59.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DE621F84C7 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:16:57 -0800 (PST)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.10
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6895"; a="451176563"
Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB01.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.10]) by cdpipgw02.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 13 Nov 2012 19:16:39 -0500
Received: from PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.78]) by PRVPEXHUB01.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.10]) with mapi; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:16:55 -0500
From: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
To: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 19:16:58 -0500
Thread-Topic: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
Thread-Index: Ac3B+jDnnZyggiNTSdWKZujoqm2+zgAAjFVA
Message-ID: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033730A825@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
References: <20121112234012.05F8E18C0CA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAFgODJcP1zvwRJukJdnqjSR-78XAMB1nSxL32gjUQB+NqpgESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A18F75.8060001@joelhalpern.com> <CAFgODJcDAzaYPrWFEJhgeCjnN_M9tdd+pdHTiccd=Dz=1mYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <EC8FD781-E416-4AE6-BA99-F74FE2DDA14D@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com> <27E72BC2-C84D-469F-9667-7A749567B477@tony.li> <CAFgODJfBX0R90oiYnxWrgC1oyr5ZPTZJA23WWu=Dbqu=xmyYTQ@mail.gmail.com> <EA48576E-4953-4408-982F-9D48497F8975@tony.li> <CAFgODJeae5EwSr8aC4b3tGBMxKPZRcfKarUuuwmA1LZKjge6ng@mail.gmail.com> <E613F100-93DE-4AB3-B71D-7250EB6D57BF@tony.li> <CAFgODJcXaCX9th9nkogLhkJu7pQE3=-Yc7DWkGNgX15Rh1UQ8g@mail.gmail.com> <957297EA-FFF8-408A-A181-E57028C9B8E1@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMZZioTNXOsST42kTP_BT4-RsjR_ysQTnZLG5pjoBEdg@mail.gmail.com> <4DE06D35-70EC-4A69-A520-971FA64673D4@tony.li> <CAFgODJdEtJ7C5vr77E7VucXhZ-fow2uQOx9xXM-oX4KvPfG_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgODJdEtJ7C5vr77E7VucXhZ-fow2uQOx9xXM-oX4KvPfG_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033730A825PRVPEXVS15cor_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "rrg@irtf.org" <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:17:00 -0000
From: rrg-bounces@irtf.org [mailto:rrg-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Dae Young KIM This group seems to be too much into LIS. There practically seems to be no room for non-LIS advocates. As soon as you hint for a non-LIS, you're almost harshly ridiculed. Why should the routing group be so much biased toward LIS which has only secondary/indirect implications on routing? [WEG] I don't see ridicule of the idea of non-LIS. I see people trying to resurrect old arguments on the prior work of this group with points that have already been endlessly discussed with no consensus reached, and I see people responding patiently, but growing less patient as others don't get the hint that the rest of us are more than ready to move on to something new. Instead of trying to rehash the last several years, again, perhaps you can look more carefully at the problems proposed for new work in this group so that we can try to make some forward progress? Wes George ________________________________ This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation William Herrin
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Danny McPherson
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Danny McPherson
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Shane Amante
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Eliot Lear
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Danny McPherson
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Christian Huitema
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Mark Townsley
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Noel Chiappa
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Jakob Heitz
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Shane Amante
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Christian Huitema
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Patrick Frejborg
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Fleischman, Eric
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation George, Wes
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation William Herrin
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation heinerhummel
- [rrg] RRG to hibernation (resent) heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation William Herrin
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Dae Young KIM
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Christian Huitema
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Eliot Lear
- [rrg] Where IRON fits in Templin, Fred L
- Re: [rrg] Where IRON fits in heinerhummel
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Christian Huitema
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation Scott Brim