Re: [rrg] [IRSG] IRSG Review: draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-12.txt

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4B63A68E0 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 04:40:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jUxxxHlQufPP for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 04:40:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E9A3A68D3 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 04:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2555895ewy.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XDIagZB1/ljQnPaoUyP9gyKUbVCeDh0YpP7q9hQzuw0=; b=fVaiRycDr4iBPVDeNhvGTeO0Irq8OPxYEYkOaYhiUmam9R9aAnLWx1rzAFEgdYmefH cCvSmiKJ4TJ9qAC2EZOdRHwNTDmhU2upHiZcViYV3AU54kqyIfrEiBHkw82TfTIxWpGu 0sGEc9tveTBvYs9jD9czznFg6LszhnDYlicBE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KY5NgSeY4OYJf+7Bx7RnVnKdzex9pkEWji6+l3LpS7YrysUEEgQ0HV+qpFd1cWMEUI WH8uY7LMXlh+ipnQGr272oqkZMrc2P5nOpo1UqZPI7ZZuSxVusg84wwmBcuCQrl/aKck WgLCGsYZuxclC08bdXlRN66n8R1O2rmjzVtz4=
Received: by 10.213.47.70 with SMTP id m6mr3209431ebf.63.1283859685326; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (64-103-25-233.cisco.com [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm9765309eei.0.2010.09.07.04.41.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Sep 2010 04:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C8624E3.4000204@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:41:23 +0200
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <467c.11769f8e.39afa473@aol.com> <4C7E7AE2.8060709@firstpr.com.au> <AAE85E2C-A76E-43F6-B7AA-F77C9ACCEBE7@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <AAE85E2C-A76E-43F6-B7AA-F77C9ACCEBE7@cs.ucla.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, Robin Whittle <rw@firstpr.com.au>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] [IRSG] IRSG Review: draft-irtf-rrg-recommendation-12.txt
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:40:59 -0000

On 09/07/2010 03:49 GMT+02:00, Lixia Zhang wrote:
> 1/ The terms CES versus CEE came from a HOTNET paper, "Towards A
> Future Internet Architecture: Arguments for Separating Edges from
> Transit Core" ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks (HotNets),
> October 2008 
> http://conferences.sigcomm.org/hotnets/2008/papers/18.pdf
> 
> I do not think "DNS-based" or not is part of the CEE concept.
> 
> 2/ I recall that long time ago I signed up to help a taxonomy draft.
> Scott Brim and I even produced a couple versions (predated the above
> mentioned paper).  Although I've stepped down from RRG, I feel an
> obligation to help finish this piece.
> 
> Let me first dig out the old draft by Scott and me. Then look over
> the mailing list discussion (if Robin has pointers at hand, that'd be
> very helpful than going through all email archive:)
> 
> I chatted with Scott about this taxonomy draft at Maastricht IETF.
> Scott, wonder if your busy period is over and have some cycles for
> this now.

I said I would be available September 10th, and look, there it is,
coming up real soon now :-).  Let's talk any time after 3pm on Friday.

Scott