IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] procedural aggregation

"Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu> Thu, 13 March 2014 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648361A0895 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:04:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.448
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y2cynjAsUCWx for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu (wmauth2.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B0A1A0887 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:04:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) id <0N2C00E00RY21M00@smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for rrg@irtf.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:04:10 -0500 (CDT)
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-2, Version=6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.3.13.25115, SenderIP=0.0.0.0
Received: from havarti.local (68-185-171-106.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com [68.185.171.106]) by smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0N2C002T1TUV3310@smtpauth2.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:04:09 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 22:04:06 -0500
From: "Dale W. Carder" <dwcarder@wisc.edu>
To: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Message-id: <20140313030406.GC3676@havarti.local>
References: <CAP-guGXyxehmCiskATSLOouE0Cx1i9KFroK60r=xWe-Lu7peSA@mail.gmail.com> <8D106691E2F8808-2798-932B@webmail-d162.sysops.aol.com> <CAP-guGU4QCHSOnr99hhvksNa8=zm_OZ9bR34HhHv7WCK55sVvw@mail.gmail.com> <5317511D.20506@joelhalpern.com> <CAP-guGVEXDe=YBgGd4Y_kSTsoRH+osfNvqmd+9KwB5pY3C6x-g@mail.gmail.com> <53176AF6.1040308@joelhalpern.com> <CAP-guGUerSYu+Xy4FJ+3EUTn-j45CAF0hSU=cpR61XeKZW9gvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAP-guGUerSYu+Xy4FJ+3EUTn-j45CAF0hSU=cpR61XeKZW9gvg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rrg/Y-SKXnELBI9NkjLYX9lTPdL2Ad8
Cc: RRG <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] procedural aggregation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:04:19 -0000

Thus spake William Herrin (bill@herrin.us) on Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 09:56:23PM -0500:
> 
> With that, can anyone offer an additional concrete example of a
> relationship between two neighboring ASes besides transit, peering and
> REN links? Or have we pretty much captured it?

Where do you feel CDN's fit in?   They sometimes are on the CDN owner's
network, sometimes they are also on ISP A's network.  The CDN in A can 
be fed settlement-free into A.  ISP B and C can be settlement-free to A
for CDN traffic.  I have seen this where A wasn't big enough to justify
having the CDN on their own without B and C's eyeballs.  Yet, A doesn't
sell transit to B or C.

Or, how about inter-domain multicast?  Maybe that is out of scope, but
these routing slots are even more scarcely available and it can break a
financial model, just like the "packet replication" from the CDN.

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email