Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 13 November 2012 06:28 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6C721F88DC for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:28:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5iRxJwOmO-ky for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8D221F88D5 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:28:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.87]) by qmta02.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NuTT1k0061smiN4A2uUwRa; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:28:56 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn6-539.cisco.com ([128.107.239.233]) by omta20.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NuSg1k00h52qHCY8guSjoR; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:26:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 22:26:40 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <27E72BC2-C84D-469F-9667-7A749567B477@tony.li>
References: <20121112234012.05F8E18C0CA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAFgODJcP1zvwRJukJdnqjSR-78XAMB1nSxL32gjUQB+NqpgESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A18F75.8060001@joelhalpern.com> <CAFgODJcDAzaYPrWFEJhgeCjnN_M9tdd+pdHTiccd=Dz=1mYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <EC8FD781-E416-4AE6-BA99-F74FE2DDA14D@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 06:28:56 -0000

On Nov 12, 2012, at 4:52 PM, Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr> wrote:

> 
> Simple: one of the contributors to the explosion is the drive for PI prefixes.  This is driven by sites that choose to be multi-homed and want failover semantics that BGP can provide.
> 
> With ILNP, a site can get this semantics with multiple PA prefixes.

> Isn't the description the same with the current IP Internet? Can't the current Internet do the same? Any change? 


No.  Today if you have a set of PA prefixes and your address changes from one to another, your TCP connections all break.

Tony