Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process

Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Sun, 13 December 2009 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0D53A6828 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:42:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.165
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.165 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tMzKufU2ivZb for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:42:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de (mailrelay.rz.uni-wuerzburg.de [132.187.3.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC45C3A67B6 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 09:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from virusscan.mail (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailrelay.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ABC5ACCB; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:42:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virusscan.mail (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511DF5ACB3; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:42:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-wuerzburg.de
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (e179087166.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.179.87.166]) by mailmaster.uni-wuerzburg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05E6E5CCBD; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:42:07 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B25275A.4050101@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 18:41:46 +0100
From: Michael Menth <menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
Organization: University of Wuerzburg
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
References: <5976B445-7209-4DE5-9D83-E2920265EB27@CS.UCLA.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <5976B445-7209-4DE5-9D83-E2920265EB27@CS.UCLA.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:42:26 -0000

Hi Lixia,

do mapping systems also belong to the discussed proposals? I assume they 
do not although a lot of the complexity taken out of the routing is put 
into them? If I am wrong, I would like to add FIRMS to the list of 
discussed proposals:
http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/~menth/Publications/papers/Menth09-FIRMS.pdf 


Kind regards,

  Michael

Lixia Zhang schrieb:
> sorry folks, day job crisis delayed this msg for a few days.
>
> Tony and I have had some discussions on how to collect the 
> recommendation document.  One comment we have heard repeated from a 
> number of people is that our recommendation should document the pros 
> and cons of different approaches, which can be very valuable, even 
> independent from whichever specific recommendations we may end up with.
>
> 1/ To steer efforts toward that goal, we would like each proposal to 
> make a concise summary, preferably no longer than ~1000 words (it may 
> contain pointer to more detailed document), that describes the key 
> ideas of the proposal of exactly how it addresses routing scalability 
> issue, where is its cost, and where is its gain.
>
> Given this message is getting out late, we would like to extend the 
> submission time from 12/15 to 12/22, before people drift away from 
> work to holidays (scream now if it does not work for some reason)
>
> 2/ with the above, we start contrast and compare proposals with each 
> other.
> We need to summarize the outcome of this step into a short document of 
> the pros and cons for each proposal.
>
> Tony, please help add things that I may have lost from memory
>
> Lixia
> PS; it is top on my todo list to get all the step-forward proposals on 
> RRG wiki. this weekend.
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> rrg@irtf.org
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

-- 
Dr. Michael Menth, Assistant Professor
University of Wuerzburg, Institute of Computer Science
Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, room B206
phone: (+49)-931/31-86644 (new), fax: (+49)-931/888-6632
mailto:menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
http://www3.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de/research/ngn