Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr> Tue, 13 November 2012 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F24921F87A4 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:53:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VwiWui0QIl72 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E6321F86A3 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so4412287qcs.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:53:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fCYepU+7uIiFM+0TAZptekveUPCuhU45MvDRxIyjZbs=; b=n5xcciC38PBXLC9TZRHPbA/LkJS/ywa39AXGt2UHC/vU/dxDNVxzI4yoldiyM8oW+h 7F6Z6pMaBubswGIUvRcPWko8udwNIvzBGMTWMOZ2Rnjn/Fz0VjYa4rwsR8EX/WWmZDt1 /V8aReOdo9g+5P2TFovc6CPsQ2r/wfXR88jSIJW7GeyPKQSfAQapEAYBl304PMFXjBA1 32p9shgdXzDF2i5p5ygU2zADbJu3cf9ziu52qC6N2MCjBZMVbJladLHhudMJss9koJGF iU0ZffJ4UK0fNmALX93YGtfHoEW4C/TWawRgRPMpFTQOC6j43tNb8PV/+h1Y8GomTPbk L8eg==
Received: by 10.49.13.202 with SMTP id j10mr28307115qec.27.1352850833076; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:53:53 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dykim6@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.12.9 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:53:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4DE06D35-70EC-4A69-A520-971FA64673D4@tony.li>
References: <20121112234012.05F8E18C0CA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAFgODJcP1zvwRJukJdnqjSR-78XAMB1nSxL32gjUQB+NqpgESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A18F75.8060001@joelhalpern.com> <CAFgODJcDAzaYPrWFEJhgeCjnN_M9tdd+pdHTiccd=Dz=1mYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <EC8FD781-E416-4AE6-BA99-F74FE2DDA14D@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com> <27E72BC2-C84D-469F-9667-7A749567B477@tony.li> <CAFgODJfBX0R90oiYnxWrgC1oyr5ZPTZJA23WWu=Dbqu=xmyYTQ@mail.gmail.com> <EA48576E-4953-4408-982F-9D48497F8975@tony.li> <CAFgODJeae5EwSr8aC4b3tGBMxKPZRcfKarUuuwmA1LZKjge6ng@mail.gmail.com> <E613F100-93DE-4AB3-B71D-7250EB6D57BF@tony.li> <CAFgODJcXaCX9th9nkogLhkJu7pQE3=-Yc7DWkGNgX15Rh1UQ8g@mail.gmail.com> <957297EA-FFF8-408A-A181-E57028C9B8E1@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMZZioTNXOsST42kTP_BT4-RsjR_ysQTnZLG5pjoBEdg@mail.gmail.com> <4DE06D35-70EC-4A69-A520-971FA64673D4@tony.li>
From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:53:32 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: b7aJrQlN3LK2bQmy4kRQAHASbE0
Message-ID: <CAFgODJdEtJ7C5vr77E7VucXhZ-fow2uQOx9xXM-oX4KvPfG_HQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da7e856f07104ce6921b5
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:53:59 -0000

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 8:23 AM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> I too would be interested in free money.   But I'm not holding my breath.
>

This group seems to be too much into LIS. There practically seems to be no
room for non-LIS advocates. As soon as you hint for a non-LIS, you're
almost harshly ridiculed.

Why should the routing group be so much biased toward LIS which has only
secondary/indirect implications on routing?

-- 
DY