Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr> Tue, 13 November 2012 23:17 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8B321F8795 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:17:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d4kuS-EMhMpA for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:17:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C3921F878F for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t11so2898141qaa.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:17:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=/qymtppK9eHk29pAuWClvCzzorua/eOhIwMy91TuEjw=; b=QbVRxulcQFiST8C6GfnFAb93O0/6WZxMyIX0vR3VZcn580SQbwyvv+JBiaT5v16TNv IDWGt3igiov46FuZhzTc/nYGNmbEUKozh5iGklgFp7RFjTCGTcG7yiP1h2Cv4boE/+UD 3MFLC1/G6UlRPAzwZAi4HDKSBkm+Hf5dtAUd7/b0ml94zymQtwvDJ8vLDKfDqyQoHmSQ MpnNdpgAKQUfHqMQXtKizrFP/0WHT/gvzG+xaqQXzhEtV0saj5MbMdYzzGVm6+gEBRdJ lFU7XpBohCFumiTpBolGZ2iUaSysKEtokZXP8PrVvbVcZbu2awAwwuONALgMTvXud0at ER8g==
Received: by 10.49.117.137 with SMTP id ke9mr28465458qeb.5.1352848644426; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:17:24 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dykim6@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.12.9 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 15:17:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <957297EA-FFF8-408A-A181-E57028C9B8E1@tony.li>
References: <20121112234012.05F8E18C0CA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAFgODJcP1zvwRJukJdnqjSR-78XAMB1nSxL32gjUQB+NqpgESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A18F75.8060001@joelhalpern.com> <CAFgODJcDAzaYPrWFEJhgeCjnN_M9tdd+pdHTiccd=Dz=1mYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <EC8FD781-E416-4AE6-BA99-F74FE2DDA14D@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com> <27E72BC2-C84D-469F-9667-7A749567B477@tony.li> <CAFgODJfBX0R90oiYnxWrgC1oyr5ZPTZJA23WWu=Dbqu=xmyYTQ@mail.gmail.com> <EA48576E-4953-4408-982F-9D48497F8975@tony.li> <CAFgODJeae5EwSr8aC4b3tGBMxKPZRcfKarUuuwmA1LZKjge6ng@mail.gmail.com> <E613F100-93DE-4AB3-B71D-7250EB6D57BF@tony.li> <CAFgODJcXaCX9th9nkogLhkJu7pQE3=-Yc7DWkGNgX15Rh1UQ8g@mail.gmail.com> <957297EA-FFF8-408A-A181-E57028C9B8E1@tony.li>
From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 08:17:04 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tXNfXQVKB-s2wL70U3VqCqeO-gE
Message-ID: <CAFgODJfMZZioTNXOsST42kTP_BT4-RsjR_ysQTnZLG5pjoBEdg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66efdfe2cb2804ce689e44
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:17:25 -0000

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> wrote:

>
> Manual renumbering is certainly the last thing that folks want to do.
>  This is why we're trying to automate it.
>

I think renumbering could also be automated with the IP hosts, albeit you
might need a shim session layer not to break APP communications. This is a
non-LIS approach which you don't buy, though.

I might be interested in a non-LIS solution with no need for renumbering,
neither for a shim session layer. Since it's a non-LIS solution even
without a shim session layer, the host doesn't have to change at all.

-- 
DY