IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation?

jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) Mon, 25 January 2010 16:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522833A68DA for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:49:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.732
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.732 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.867, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bRbCMegiRKEe for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.lcs.mit.edu (mercury.lcs.mit.edu [18.26.0.122]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA273A68D3 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:49:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 11178) id C81196BE5C9; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:49:58 -0500 (EST)
To: rrg@irtf.org
Message-Id: <20100125164958.C81196BE5C9@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:49:58 -0500
From: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Cc: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:49:53 -0000

    > From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>

    >> LISP is really intended to achieve one chief goal: to split up
    >> location and identity

    > (Insert repeat of arguments about "identity", and how LISP separates
    > global from local routing, here.)

(Insert repeat of arguments about how LISP Mobile Node stuff shows examples
of where a LISP EID has _no_ location semantics, and how as long as you have
un-modified legacy hosts, you can't do a total 100% clean separation. :-)

    > The just-in-time ugly Internet.

Yes... installed base, the Architect's Bane! :-)

	Noel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email