IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi> Tue, 04 February 2014 18:00 UTC

Return-Path: <decoy@iki.fi>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939021A0169 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:00:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_54=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ftOvlSEpXUdS for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mx1.kapsi.fi [IPv6:2001:1bc8:1004::1:25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F991A0158 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lakka.kapsi.fi ([2001:1bc8:1004::1] ident=Debian-exim) by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <decoy@iki.fi>) id 1WAkI3-0001Q2-QS; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:00:07 +0200
Received: from decoy (helo=localhost) by lakka.kapsi.fi with local-esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <decoy@iki.fi>) id 1WAkHy-0004So-JO; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:00:02 +0200
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 20:00:02 +0200
From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
Sender: decoy@kapsi.fi
To: "Osterweil, Eric" <eosterweil@verisign.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E499501-18BB-49CE-ABC9-7820DE5F67B7@verisign.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1402041957250.23815@lakka.kapsi.fi>
References: <5B131180-FA93-4A05-B3BE-3A23767EBD9D@netapp.com> <5BB6C63B-4C53-4552-991D-AB50B2E66247@netapp.com> <CAPv4CP8bQSjEB5JJC1Q1go4b20878hvcsyap-HSquJV5KZAfNw@mail.gmail.com> <6E499501-18BB-49CE-ABC9-7820DE5F67B7@verisign.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:1bc8:1004::1
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: decoy@iki.fi
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: "rrg@irtf.org" <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 18:00:11 -0000

On 2014-02-04, Osterweil, Eric wrote:

>> Please don't kill the mailing list. It doesn't hurt anyone, and having
>> it around will make it easier to have ad hoc discussions. You can
>> declare the RRG suspended (it is :-)) but I don't see the point in
>> expunging it.
>
> +1

-1. In the sense that stale lists really *can* hurt the normal IETF 
process. It's not for nothing that they are kept to a minimum.

At the same time, even as the kind of lurker that I am, it'd be sad to 
see the list go, especially when there's so much research level routing 
stuff out there. Starting with my two favourites, which are content/name 
based routing as a fundamental primitive, and how to model+push the data 
from current overlays into the primary routing fabric.
-- 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-40-3255353, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email