Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Tue, 19 November 2013 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEC81AE0F5 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NI89BaQrrclp for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355AC1AE0E3 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.73]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id rSEu1m0041afHeLA1V1dDA; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:01:37 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.181.139.254]) by omta17.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id rV1c1m00B5VX96D8dV1cYL; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:01:37 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <20131119135800.82F7518C126@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:01:35 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <62E077F0-FEAE-4CC1-BFF9-07D2F409340D@tony.li>
References: <20131119135800.82F7518C126@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
To: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa)
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1384880497; bh=QSvH7fwpvUKRotX9wxBeiQxJ+QOGEsqTm6Y2DdFXc9o=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To; b=q1Zm5YFnX4VGbediZxSA84mEU/d6gFDpHdOEeJd2iRWg25to2shRujUl0O5aVDAef P32ZgkUFetZ/TtbTzMZ9tflm3pg+yjwtL6lcCOwpgmHpfbpH4fOJmZ4IOqMQbZlkf/ 1odEZFDiAniWuS3MOHqcBPF/cuMz5ZwS92mAWyqzXY1fYM9DZo4pBrc8gydm8IiGHx c7llO+VpC1/Ey5wMeEyt62wjWJ+U+G2Mm+fNREsHjiaTl9cZVXp3ThBb6bBWA6NbbR xG/5Qij8rcKtj7+Q4qrJSkezXPBkrgoWzEITbdWhQJy2pO0CHIAcx8bDYJZzilpAzm OS8S0K/R7dZ3A==
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Rebooting the RRG
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg/>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 17:01:44 -0000

On Nov 19, 2013, at 5:58 AM, jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu (Noel Chiappa) wrote:

>> From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>;
> 
>> the IETF has said it doesn't want to come up with any more clever ways
>> to help organizations continue to squeeze more life out of IPv4
>> addresses. It will help with transition away from IPv4. 
> 
> Just like with NAT. The IETF would rather stick its head in the ground -
> thereby ensuring that whatever happens, it will be done by individual actors,
> in an incoherent way.
> 
> Like the Bourbons, the IETF has learned nothing, and forgotten nothing.



Guys,

Can we please get back to program planning?

Again, we are looking for speakers to invite.  References to interesting routing papers and research would be very helpful.

Thanks,
Tony