Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li> Sun, 11 November 2012 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.li@tony.li>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8C421F8555 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:45:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.437
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.437 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27zM9ReDX834 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C4F21F84CD for <rrg@irtf.org>; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:45:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.43]) by qmta10.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NHYl1k0030vp7WLAAHlnSU; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:45:47 +0000
Received: from [192.168.2.103] ([98.248.36.188]) by omta05.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id NHlZ1k00h43ZcXW8RHllrE; Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:45:47 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tony Li <tony.li@tony.li>
In-Reply-To: <509F7C59.7080900@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 09:45:33 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DF11188A-3D05-4D75-8C07-7ED42B146E7E@tony.li>
References: <20121110032942.BD27018C113@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <4C845B01-B282-46FB-A4B8-7ADDBCC9C6E5@tcb.net> <B80A8335-49BD-4B90-A024-FA82B1E8EE5F@tony.li> <C64A3635-DE95-41F6-A70C-43597EB58CBB@tcb.net> <7CBB1514-5A26-4B12-BAA3-BF2AA3CC80F4@tony.li> <509F7C59.7080900@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org, Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:45:48 -0000

On Nov 11, 2012, at 2:22 AM, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:

> This having been said, I think this group like any other group – based
> on contributions and participation.  If there are no contributions and
> if there is no participation, no work can continue.  On the other hand,
> when there are contributions or participation, we shouldn't be hasty in
> closing the effort.  Therefore, I would suggest a solicitation for new
> topics with the threat of closure, before actually closing – or going
> dormant.


Eliot,

Thanks, but as you may recall, we did do a solicitation of new topics some time ago.  It didn't provoke anything substantive and there has been no additional input.

Further, the transition to hibernation is easily reversed if and when a new substantive topic presents itself.

Tony