Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

[Dae Young KIM <[e-mail]>]

Dear Noel,

As I know, the original rationale for RRG was to find a solution to
mitigate the DFZ routing table explosion. LIS like ILNP was then proposed
as a solution mechanism.

One might argue that LIS does not help reduce the DFZ routing table size;
please find the attachment. If there's any point in the argument, then
we've not accomplished our original task wrt DFZ routing table explosion,
echoing your point.

On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Noel Chiappa <[e-mail]>wrote:

>     > From: Tony Li <[e-mail]>
>
>     > The publication of these RFCs concludes our long standing work item
> on
>     > a revised routing architecture.
>
> Separation of location and identity is very desirable, but it has basically
> nothing to do with routing (other than removing identity functionality from
> the names used for routing, making them a bit more tractable).
>
> We still have the same old kludgy BGP global routing system we always had,
> and _nothing_ has been proposed to improve/replace it.
>
>     > The group has ... helped push the boundaries of routing farther
>     > forward.
>
> Nonsense. It has produced no routing work at all.
>
>         Noel
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> [e-mail]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
>



-- 
DY