Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation

Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr> Wed, 14 November 2012 00:39 UTC

Return-Path: <dykim6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CD821F87C0 for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:39:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lg0eV1FZNzqV for <rrg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A841021F84F2 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:39:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k19so4437503qcs.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:39:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=fxcxF4uI/WAJRyTtndgvTK6r+2pSUE8edSWUN99Kta8=; b=YoL30FXUVyrvlyBL3Xwc54wb/nvyF3x58UESsP44xtQFEpyOeseYZ4Xz44WfEKT/Q4 /JGn4zoO35sIL793FXPuwGa+lPfYfH8Pw28gM8TfrRRGitCoO6IdEMjHYU7dRhzbcEWW svghHrxDEGV7Z9FF8EriQgy/rZFi6IE8uFrAF22xznpUgnPpcAJlHFTCyQTv0sG3jI5j xF0wamz4lpmvixaA8UkpvPfquFBkv2WK7uoyN6G5VWPrctzpNJY/m5/B7saeUdT+zH2d 67xfXbDjXBuCfndqj6ekDnh0ZbZnZnJu9xOG5a0est4bvFTERxV4RJmy67iKosl6TXSD lzcA==
Received: by 10.49.3.234 with SMTP id f10mr28454200qef.45.1352853540517; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:39:00 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: dykim6@gmail.com
Received: by 10.49.12.9 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:38:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033730A825@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
References: <20121112234012.05F8E18C0CA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <CAFgODJcP1zvwRJukJdnqjSR-78XAMB1nSxL32gjUQB+NqpgESg@mail.gmail.com> <50A18F75.8060001@joelhalpern.com> <CAFgODJcDAzaYPrWFEJhgeCjnN_M9tdd+pdHTiccd=Dz=1mYrLg@mail.gmail.com> <EC8FD781-E416-4AE6-BA99-F74FE2DDA14D@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMBJBxNJ_M1_L=K0f2DpbZvzOBUgLZ6sT+-y+JevGeSg@mail.gmail.com> <27E72BC2-C84D-469F-9667-7A749567B477@tony.li> <CAFgODJfBX0R90oiYnxWrgC1oyr5ZPTZJA23WWu=Dbqu=xmyYTQ@mail.gmail.com> <EA48576E-4953-4408-982F-9D48497F8975@tony.li> <CAFgODJeae5EwSr8aC4b3tGBMxKPZRcfKarUuuwmA1LZKjge6ng@mail.gmail.com> <E613F100-93DE-4AB3-B71D-7250EB6D57BF@tony.li> <CAFgODJcXaCX9th9nkogLhkJu7pQE3=-Yc7DWkGNgX15Rh1UQ8g@mail.gmail.com> <957297EA-FFF8-408A-A181-E57028C9B8E1@tony.li> <CAFgODJfMZZioTNXOsST42kTP_BT4-RsjR_ysQTnZLG5pjoBEdg@mail.gmail.com> <4DE06D35-70EC-4A69-A520-971FA64673D4@tony.li> <CAFgODJdEtJ7C5vr77E7VucXhZ-fow2uQOx9xXM-oX4KvPfG_HQ@mail.gmail.com> <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033730A825@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com>
From: Dae Young KIM <dykim@cnu.kr>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 09:38:40 +0900
X-Google-Sender-Auth: MRYi-GL6zpJBXEbUopzgLcHaBhg
Message-ID: <CAFgODJeAd+oAgu0GcqOo7ZkZ+h9Q8Er1dKv_YrxiQkG=RB6rXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb03e68b735f504ce69c225
Cc: "rrg@irtf.org" <rrg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [rrg] RRG to hibernation
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 00:39:03 -0000

On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:16 AM, George, Wes <wesley.george@twcable.com>wrote;wrote:

>
>  *[WEG] I don’t see ridicule of the idea of non-LIS. I see people trying
> to resurrect old arguments on the prior work of this group with points that
> have already been endlessly discussed with no consensus reached, and I see
> people responding patiently, but growing less patient as others don’t get
> the hint that the rest of us are more than ready to move on to something
> new. Instead of trying to rehash the last several years, again, perhaps you
> can look more carefully at the problems proposed for new work in this group
> so that we can try to make some forward progress?*
>

OK, fine, let's move on.
-- 
DY