Re: [rrg] Constraints due to the need for widespread voluntary adoption

[Dae Young KIM <[e-mail]>]

OK, in fact, I do know all yours are for good intention.

Only that your list of constraints would be used as a kind of guiding
lights. Not as an absolute measure to cut off branches.

Mostly, your constraints are common-sense, well-intended. Good to bear in
mind. But, let's leave room where we have to inevitably or for good
persuading reason break the walls and not to meet to some or quite a number
of them.

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Robin Whittle <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hello DY,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > So, it pretty much seems that we're practically left with only two
> > candidates alive by now. All others practically gone. Let alone any
> > other new coming proposals, considering that most of those renowned old
> > proposals even have not survived.
> >
> > I only have to read two proposals. Thank you for saving my time.
>
> I am not tying to discourage you from reading anything.  If you
> disagree with anything I wrote, please write in detail about what you
> believe and why - that will be a good discussion.
>
> Likewise, if you think my attempt at listing the constraints is
> unrealistic, please sugggest improvements.
>
>  - Robin
>
>


-- 
Regards,

DY
http://cnu.kr/~dykim