Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process

Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU> Tue, 15 December 2009 06:29 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0813A6810 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.093, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FRJYhH4gxDPe for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1433A6827 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19BC639E80D9; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4FylzDSNz0tL; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.1.3] (cpe-98-151-23-234.socal.res.rr.com [98.151.23.234]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2E3639E807B; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:30 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <041961E8-1573-4613-95B0-742A9025EBA4@CS.UCLA.EDU>
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@CS.UCLA.EDU>
To: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20091215001630.GA15671@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:29:30 -0800
References: <5976B445-7209-4DE5-9D83-E2920265EB27@CS.UCLA.EDU> <20091215001630.GA15671@vaf-lnx1.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] belated msg: further description of the recommendation process
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 06:29:44 -0000

got it

On Dec 14, 2009, at 4:16 PM, Vince Fuller wrote:

>> 1/ To steer efforts toward that goal, we would like each proposal to
>> make a concise summary, preferably no longer than ~1000 words (it
>> may contain pointer to more detailed document), that describes the
>> key ideas of the proposal of exactly how it addresses routing
>> scalability issue, where is its cost, and where is its gain.
>
> Lixia, Tony-
>
> Here is the response for LISP.
>
> 	--Vince
> 	(on behalf of the other LISP authors: Dino, Dave, and Darrel)