IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Terminology

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Thu, 04 February 2010 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9E53A6DD3 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:56:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.097, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1vlP6MvnubVi for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57DF3A69F9 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws11 with SMTP id 11so1279967vws.13 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:57:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=IhWzqCD1KVk3/BCNK+gwjdcNhTxTWqg9XUAWIddf5fY=; b=DwZSxHRPZAAk2z19VHRZ6GSVkcxXIpagW3FJo10TRG5N8xvJ3HI5CHwLiomcUipvDZ 0PntJO8vCNhtb7cBo+wmGzt4w5Bs70dQ/recStcNMERCUUvHma5nmQMAcyORBPfVioFq wXqL0qqFKBS+HrlyBexCtzy36Kp3TVs6eVy/4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=NtBehcaL3YwSgIQB+byNKVQvsOj0wghsyDr7439k1d+L/w1+lcrDsz3Bfh6MfgcC6t 2114c5hVNr3ju/j1Bhyr9xdNlX6fNy1d7x0d5aBm1DlFnQOoPyv/8c293TvK6K/onScW vMI2ny2HIbIULEjocUc8FmPAZh367Fhp7/z0w=
Received: by 10.220.122.88 with SMTP id k24mr2277220vcr.19.1265299015570; Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 40sm2055249vws.17.2010.02.04.07.56.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B6AEE40.4020307@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 10:56:48 -0500
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
References: <20100204154433.846406BE5BA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20100204154433.846406BE5BA@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Terminology
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:56:18 -0000

Noel Chiappa allegedly wrote on 02/04/2010 10:44 EST:
>     > From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
> 
>     >> "The CES vs. CEE distinction does not arise from whether hosts are
>     >> altered or not. It arises from the fundamentally different mechanisms
>     >> which are used by these two different types of architecture to achieve
>     >> scalable routing."
> 
>     > the two different approaches it distinguishes between are to separate
>     > edge routing/addressing from non-edge and eliminating the distinction.
> 
> If your summation is right, I think I'm starting to grasp what these terms
> are trying to get at, and it might be useful architectural terminology.

I'm in a meeting right now but the best explication was probably slides
from Lixia from 2008, I think.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email