IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation?

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 26 January 2010 04:48 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9924F3A67D8 for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:48:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1gDFKS3Yg1h for <rrg@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:48:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8758D3A62C1 for <rrg@irtf.org>; Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:48:15 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtMAAEcDXkuQ/uCWe2dsb2JhbACcCgEBFiQGpiCWdoQ5BI1i
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,344,1262563200"; d="scan'208";a="56489389"
Received: from ams-core-1.cisco.com ([144.254.224.150]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2010 04:48:22 +0000
Received: from [192.168.49.197] (ams3-vpn-dhcp5001.cisco.com [10.61.83.136]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o0Q4mMGZ024714; Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:48:22 GMT
Message-Id: <16FF2E4C-D1E3-4B04-8418-EC0BCED7BFCF@cisco.com>
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
To: jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20100126043417.42F116BE5D6@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 05:48:22 +0100
References: <20100126043417.42F116BE5D6@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: rrg@irtf.org
Subject: Re: [rrg] Arguments in favour of Core-Edge Elimination vs. Separation?
X-BeenThere: rrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IRTF Routing Research Group <rrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/rrg>
List-Post: <mailto:rrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg>, <mailto:rrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 04:48:16 -0000

On Jan 26, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Noel Chiappa wrote:

> Are you really propose dumping 10 million PI entries into the DFZ?

Yes; anyone who proposes general PI addressing is talking about that.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email