IETF Logo Mail Archive

[RSN] Sleepy routers

"Ian Chakeres" <ian.chakeres@gmail.com> Fri, 07 December 2007 00:31 UTC

Return-path: <rsn-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0R7X-0002gy-Sn; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:31:11 -0500
Received: from rsn by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0R7W-0002Y5-41 for rsn-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:31:10 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0R7V-0002Xw-Qn for rsn@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:31:09 -0500
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.188]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0R7V-0000I1-Hs for rsn@ietf.org; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 19:31:09 -0500
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id d21so196575nfb for <rsn@ietf.org>; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:31:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=rL1W0qt9t4qQGg4L6vG8rmd9WLIx09OTjwgZt5StEhI=; b=YNL2LPI8Cbtg12FUcB248+WQHd1rbbnz3dZvea9O7oXsd15GEX2A8Yn9sybzC/5YCHGBevzzDlIZ6/lhnD8hJk6iTkcI4h0AFspPWcKOxPodhWYpU0OpxFGTyYivUfiEISAckaW2ytZzWxl/esKUi+sTiOpPzPQdchUFb2Np3Kc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QnB3MYn5PPT6ombwaUBUkHec4crTrsEo9miYaH9xTx9C6ox0AVY+hW3+zJuxE+VIp3oY9WcKP0ZkXFTGydBqXDJLOMR/Yxj91h5s90x4Uuh8wkRynjuAZNbbGEtmkSZ6OgFrdm7oZhJRSOmAud7xCK4ASTqaM/0P1RQwtS/hUDU=
Received: by 10.78.139.14 with SMTP id m14mr3114860hud.1196987468703; Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.78.23.14 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Dec 2007 16:31:08 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <374005f30712061631p32943fdajb1c61e904a942e94@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 06:01:08 +0530
From: Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>
To: rsn@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014
Subject: [RSN] Sleepy routers
X-BeenThere: rsn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Sensor Networks <rsn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn>, <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rsn>
List-Post: <mailto:rsn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn>, <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rsn-bounces@ietf.org

>From the proposed charter and name of the group I know that low-power
and lossy are two important components. I was wondering whether these
routers sleeping most (95%+) of the time should also be elevated to
this status.

What do you think? Is the fact that routers are sleeping a lot one of
the core issues that needs to be solved in this WG?

Ian


_______________________________________________
RSN mailing list
RSN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email