Re: [RSN] Sleepy routers

Tim,
  What do you mean by saying most of the nodes are sleeping most of the
time.

Ian's question is much more insightful.  There is a big difference
between networks that have all of the routers awake all of the time and
a network where the routers sleep.

I have no idea which you mean.  I understand what Ian means.

	geoff

On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 19:17 -0600, Timothy J. Salo wrote:
> Ian Chakeres wrote:
> > From the proposed charter and name of the group I know that low-power
> > and lossy are two important components. I was wondering whether these
> > routers sleeping most (95%+) of the time should also be elevated to
> > this status.
> > 
> > What do you think? Is the fact that routers are sleeping a lot one of
> > the core issues that needs to be solved in this WG?
> 
> Cool!
> 
> Hopefully, the working group will start by specifying the semantics
> of multicast in networks where most of the nodes are sleeping most
> of the time.
> 
> Then, maybe, the working group can explain how to realize those
> semantics.
> 
> -tjs
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RSN mailing list
> RSN@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn

_______________________________________________
RSN mailing list
RSN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn