RE: [RSN] Working group name
"David Culler" <dculler@archrock.com> Sun, 09 December 2007 01:07 UTC
Return-path: <rsn-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Adx-0005nI-EU; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:41 -0500
Received: from rsn by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Adw-0005cz-3H for rsn-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Adv-0005cr-Pk for rsn@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:39 -0500
Received: from mail.sf.archrock.com ([64.147.171.179]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Adv-0002ye-F9 for rsn@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:07:39 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sf.archrock.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699E9A964F; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:07:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Score: -4.296
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.296 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.103, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.sf.archrock.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sf.archrock.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H2FQpnW5AJPn; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:07:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sf.archrock.com (mail.sf.archrock.com [64.147.171.179]) by mail.sf.archrock.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9198EA9634; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:07:35 -0800 (PST)
From: David Culler <dculler@archrock.com>
To: 'Geoff Mulligan' <geoff@mulligan.com>, rsn@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [RSN] Working group name
Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:07:35 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
thread-index: Acg5toiugw847/7jTK2Su0vEj4TKSAASTlYw
In-Reply-To: <1197067095.6356.70.camel@dellx1>
X-Originating-IP: [64.142.4.192]
Message-ID: <3512068.40391197162455585.JavaMail.root@mail.sf.archrock.com>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2409bba43e9c8d580670fda8b695204a
Cc:
X-BeenThere: rsn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Sensor Networks <rsn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn>, <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rsn>
List-Post: <mailto:rsn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn>, <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rsn-bounces@ietf.org
Just to lighten things up. I think that, assuming the WG is approve, it will be ROLL. And roll it will do. -----Original Message----- From: Geoff Mulligan [mailto:geoff@mulligan.com] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2007 2:38 PM To: rsn@ietf.org Subject: [RSN] Working group name Did we decide to use ROLL rather than RL2N as the name for the potential working group? I think that David mentioned my term Lousy so I like Routing Over Lousy Links. David and JP thanks for the excellent meeting. geoff _______________________________________________ RSN mailing list RSN@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn _______________________________________________ RSN mailing list RSN@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn
- [RSN] Working group name Geoff Mulligan
- Re: [RSN] Working group name JP Vasseur
- RE: [RSN] Working group name David Culler
- Re: [RSN] Working group name Geoff Mulligan