IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [RSN] Sleepy routers

Geoff Mulligan <geoff-ietf@mulligan.org> Sat, 08 December 2007 09:10 UTC

Return-path: <rsn-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0vhS-0003ll-2x; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:10:18 -0500
Received: from rsn by megatron.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1J0vhQ-0003kg-BF for rsn-confirm+ok@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:10:16 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0vhP-0003gq-U7 for rsn@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:10:15 -0500
Received: from grab.coslabs.com ([199.233.92.34]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0vhP-0002Yv-D0 for rsn@ietf.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 04:10:15 -0500
Received: from [199.233.92.20] (dev20.coslabs.com [199.233.92.20]) by grab.coslabs.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lB89AA8n012223; Sat, 8 Dec 2007 02:10:11 -0700 (MST)
Subject: Re: [RSN] Sleepy routers
From: Geoff Mulligan <geoff-ietf@mulligan.org>
To: Ian Chakeres <ian.chakeres@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <374005f30712061631p32943fdajb1c61e904a942e94@mail.gmail.com>
References: <374005f30712061631p32943fdajb1c61e904a942e94@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:50:43 -0700
Message-Id: <1197064243.6356.25.camel@dellx1>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906
Cc: rsn@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: rsn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Routing Sensor Networks <rsn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn>, <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/rsn>
List-Post: <mailto:rsn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn>, <mailto:rsn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: rsn-bounces@ietf.org

Ian,
  I don't know if one of the CORE issues, but I do think that it is an
issue.

	geoff

On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 06:01 +0530, Ian Chakeres wrote:
> >From the proposed charter and name of the group I know that low-power
> and lossy are two important components. I was wondering whether these
> routers sleeping most (95%+) of the time should also be elevated to
> this status.
> 
> What do you think? Is the fact that routers are sleeping a lot one of
> the core issues that needs to be solved in this WG?
> 
> Ian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RSN mailing list
> RSN@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn



_______________________________________________
RSN mailing list
RSN@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsn

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email