Re: [rsvp-dir] Our first work items for RSVP Directorate

[Lou Berger <[e-mail]>]

Bruce,
	
On 6/4/2010 12:41 PM, Bruce Davie wrote:
> Folks,
>   There are a few drafts floating around that I think we should take a look at and make a recommendation to the ADs regarding their suitability for the TSVWG. These drafts are:
>
> draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing-02
>
> draft-lefaucheur-tsvwg-rsvp-multiple-preemption-02.txt
> draft-polk-tsvwg-intserv-multiple-tspec-03.txt
>
> The first one seems pretty non-controversial. Here are comments from the author:
>>
>> draft-narayanan-tsvwg-rsvp-resource-sharing-02 is now a companion draft to draft-berger-ccamp-assoc-info-01, and contains only the RSVP-CAC-specific part of the resource sharing thingy. Given that TSVWG is the place for RSVP CAC extensions, yes, I would think TSVWG is the place for it. It's a very small draft basically defining a new codepoint (Resource Sharing Remote-ID Association) with a small behavioural change (only treat this Association-ID as binding on the Resv, not on the Path), so I don't envision any significant backpressure of the form "this is not a small change to RSVP".
>
> I would like to recommend that this be made a TSVWG work item. Any comments or concerns?
>

No concerns, but this does raise the point that the directorate should 
be aware of draft-berger-ccamp-assoc-info-01.  Particularly that in it's 
current form the draft extends a TE mechanism to apply to the non-TE/LSP 
RSVP sessions.

Lou