Re: [rsvp-dir] Consideration of Experimental CTypes

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Wed, 12 December 2012 18:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DB121E80E7 for <rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:07:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.02
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.02 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.245, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2yIjFw+MBYE for <rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy8-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.22.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D03E21E805A for <rsvp-dir@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:07:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 30150 invoked by uid 0); 12 Dec 2012 18:06:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy8.bluehost.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2012 18:06:38 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=gIHDrN1RxaOzv08Vi3PhsxzIq0IxO3Vhgm5eokw7/xU=; b=vLTpH9CXO9sSR0W7Mt4Z9cU8AJH0XJZ/LmTV+SQV+p1BFhMJt8Yq2q1O8vKx27o42sKZRnyMWUQ28qfEBxqAav9223VaYcse8DXWwdH396skB2gsTRXFDSHPMsN53+oy;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:44477 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1Tiqha-0002PN-O0; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:06:38 -0700
Message-ID: <50C8C7AD.1050407@labn.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:06:37 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
References: <096201cdd87a$9dad1c30$d9075490$@olddog.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <096201cdd87a$9dad1c30$d9075490$@olddog.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: iesg@ietf.org, rsvp-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rsvp-dir] Consideration of Experimental CTypes
X-BeenThere: rsvp-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: RSVP directorate <rsvp-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rsvp-dir>, <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rsvp-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rsvp-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsvp-dir>, <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 18:07:05 -0000

Adrian,
	Is this a general question or one that is focused on a specific
experiment?  If an experiment is to take place privately, as this one
is, is there any need for an assignment?

Lou

On 12/12/2012 10:08 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi RSVP-Directorate,
> 
> The IESG is looking at draft-kumaki-murai-l3vpn-rsvp-te during IESG evaluation
> and post-IESTF last call.
> 
> The document is intended to be Experimental, and wants to carry out its
> experiment by adding some CTypes to existing CNums. However, the IANA registry
> observes...
> 
>> For Class Numbers that pre-date [RFC3936] (specifically, 0, 1, 3-25,
>> 30-37, 42-45, 64, 65, 128-131, 161-165, 192-196, and 207), the
>> default assignment policy for new Class Types is Standards Action,
>> unless a Standards Track or Best Current Practice RFC supercedes this.
> 
> What is your view of the intention? Is the purpose to block experimentation on
> existing CNums? How should experiments be carried out?
> 
> An option, I suppose is to replicate the CNums into Experimental CNums and
> include the experimental CTypes there.
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rsvp-dir mailing list
> rsvp-dir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsvp-dir
> 
> 
> 
>