Re: [rsvp-dir] RSVP directorate formed

"James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com> Mon, 10 May 2010 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jmpolk@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: rsvp-dir@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rsvp-dir@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37B63A6817; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.73
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.73 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.620, BAYES_05=-1.11, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rTFmdwybYApW; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E1A3A6BE7; Mon, 10 May 2010 11:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEANfo50urR7H+/2dsb2JhbACeI3GjWZlPgmCCNASDQQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,363,1270425600"; d="scan'208";a="195277399"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2010 18:09:20 +0000
Received: from jmpolk-wxp01.cisco.com (rcdn-jmpolk-8713.cisco.com [10.99.80.20]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o4AI9JUB014538; Mon, 10 May 2010 18:09:19 GMT
Message-Id: <201005101809.o4AI9JUB014538@sj-core-2.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 13:09:18 -0500
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, tsvwg@ietf.org
From: "James M. Polk" <jmpolk@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <E119C8DF-64CE-46DD-976B-1C9750720F45@nokia.com>
References: <E119C8DF-64CE-46DD-976B-1C9750720F45@nokia.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 May 2010 11:12:02 -0700
Cc: IAB IAB <iab@iab.org>, "tsv-area@ietf.org Area" <tsv-area@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, rsvp-dir@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [rsvp-dir] RSVP directorate formed
X-BeenThere: rsvp-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: RSVP directorate <rsvp-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsvp-dir>, <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rsvp-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rsvp-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsvp-dir>, <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 18:10:41 -0000

Lars

This is great news!

James

At 08:01 AM 5/10/2010, Lars Eggert wrote:
>Hi,
>
>following the discussion during the IETF-77 TSVAREA meeting on how 
>to better review and progress extensions to (non-TE) RSVP and 
>IntServ, the transport area directors have formed a new RSVP 
>directorate and given it these tasks:
>
>   * Review of all new work related to RSVP and Integrated Services that
>     is proposed for IETF adoption. The purpose of this review is to
>     advise the ADs and the chairs of the Transport Area Working Group
>     (TSVWG) on whether a particular proposal should be taken on as a
>     work item. The directorate will continue to guide and review such
>     new work in TSVWG until it is ready for publication as an RFC.
>
>   * Review of selected documents during IETF last call or under IESG
>     review. The directorate monitors ongoing IETF work and should
>     independently decide when a document will benefit from their review,
>     assign a reviewer and enter into a follow-on discussion with the
>     authors. When deemed necessary, the area directors will on occasion
>     directly consult the directorate while forming their opinion on
>     selected documents being under review by the IESG.
>
>   * Cross-working group review. RSVP documents may have relevance to
>     several working groups, including TSVWG and MPLS-related groups
>     such as MPLS WG and CCAMP WG. The directorate will ensure that
>     drafts submitted to TSV WG are reviewed in the appropriate MPLS-related
>     WGs if necessary, and will bring drafts from the MPLS-related WGs
>     to the attention of the TSV WG as appropriate.
>
>The directorate can be reached at rsv-dir@ietf.org. Additional 
>information about the directorate is at 
>http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/tsv/trac/wiki/RSVP-Directorate.
>
>Lars