[rsvp-dir] Fwd: AD followup: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying - IPR discussion

Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Fri, 22 July 2011 08:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383E721F86BC for <rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76kuny9dC6k1 for <rsvp-dir@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:10:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from erg.abdn.ac.uk (dee.erg.abdn.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:241:204:203:baff:fe9a:8c9b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2340C21F86AE for <rsvp-dir@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 01:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Gorry.local (fgrpf.plus.com []) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.abdn.ac.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p6M89oT8027000 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <rsvp-dir@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:09:50 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <4E29304E.1020001@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:09:50 +0100
From: Gorry Fairhurst <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Organization: The University of Aberdeen is a charity registered in Scotland, No SC013683.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsvp-dir@ietf.org
References: <94007F3F05A24CF0AAFA916B42F93E69@davidPC>
In-Reply-To: <94007F3F05A24CF0AAFA916B42F93E69@davidPC>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <94007F3F05A24CF0AAFA916B42F93E69@davidPC>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ERG-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-ERG-MailScanner-From: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
Subject: [rsvp-dir] Fwd: AD followup: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying - IPR discussion
X-BeenThere: rsvp-dir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk
List-Id: RSVP directorate <rsvp-dir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rsvp-dir>, <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rsvp-dir>
List-Post: <mailto:rsvp-dir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rsvp-dir>, <mailto:rsvp-dir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 08:10:20 -0000

RSVP directorate,

We can't find any discussion of this in TSVWG, so we'll be looking for 
comments on how this IPR should be considered for an INFO doc from the WG.

Best wishes,


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: AD followup: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rsvp-security-groupkeying
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 02:40:48 -0400
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: <tsvwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
CC: <tsv-ads@tools.ietf.org>


Has the WG explicitly discussed acceptability of the IPR terms related
to this document? The RAND terms apply for compliance to the standard,
but this is not being submitted as a standards-track document. The terms 
in the IPR declaration do not seem to provide non-assert status for 
implementing an Informational document.

Has the WG discussed this?

If so, can you provide a link to the relevant thread?

David Harrington
Director, IETF Transport Area
ietfdbh@comcast.net (preferred for ietf)
+1 603 828 1401 (cell)