Re: [rsvp-dir] missing assignments for integrated services

"James M. Polk" <> Fri, 18 March 2011 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80763A6A2E; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.577
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.022, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h+d7hL2FroPm; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1983A6A1E; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 14:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=1249; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1300482838; x=1301692438; h=message-id:date:to:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to: references:mime-version; bh=/GYFtKt18m7V1sX4J/3n3ZKDA6mR6sGSgqz+1SLehnc=; b=IeJFqCRUpPbzK2GCgQg4EV5R9FaC7/4YMex5NRMd8md7IfPTDSJLfHaA dX4YMvDBTOnbYsr+dNkJx6zTBsdox8HZFtm/BNgCPIGMU+bHX2NU7xSM4 BsECifIpwo8StvKyEW3VsqqgceFwHm1WZvbmjGO7YiEf9t1qD1jtz4yuW M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAG5og02tJXG+/2dsb2JhbAClcneoBZwUhWMEhTE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,207,1299456000"; d="scan'208";a="415966808"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 18 Mar 2011 21:13:57 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p2ILDvbB009156; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:13:57 GMT
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 16:13:56 -0500
To: Lou Berger <>,
From: "James M. Polk" <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [rsvp-dir] missing assignments for integrated services
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: RSVP directorate <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:12:29 -0000

At 05:15 PM 3/17/2011, Lou Berger wrote:
>It looks like rfc2997 values never made it into
>In particular:
>Service name, service number 6 (Null)
>Parameter ID, parameter 128 (Null Service TSpec)


I noticed about 2 years ago that there seemed to be a great many IANA 
assignments missing. I was going to go through all the RSVP and 
IntServ docs I could find and write up basically the IANA 
registration section for each in this separate doc (because some 
don't even have IANA considerations sections in the RFCs). The plan 
was to officially "update" each RFC that has not had assignments 
entered into IANA.

I haven't gotten close to finishing this task, but not because it is 
too daunting or tedious, but because other things are frequently more 
important or I'm fightin` fires at my day job.

I still plan on completing this effort. In fact, I have several IDs 
just coming out of WGLC or with the IESG right now, and that should 
create enough time for me to write this - hopefully before Quebec or Taiwan.

BTW - any missing assignments that anyone is aware of, please let me 
know. I'll add them into this new doc.