From: Jay Daley <exec-director@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <EBCAC3E9-8405-47AF-8885-DD1140686E2C@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_05E2966C-A826-4CA0-8E60-91164BEE41D5"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 17:04:41 +0100
In-Reply-To: <E423CF6F-24C3-4A4D-89B4-A38757EDBCFC@icann.org>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org>
References: <E423CF6F-24C3-4A4D-89B4-A38757EDBCFC@icann.org>
Message-ID-Hash: RWEYWJIYFUPMWWCAFGWLAHV524FKUGU5
CC: RSWG <rswg@rfc-editor.org>, Sandy Ginoza <sginoza@amsl.com>
Precedence: list
Subject: =?utf-8?q?=5BRswg=5D_Re=3A_Response_to_RSAB_Last_Call_comments_on_draft-rswg?=
 =?utf-8?q?-rfc7990-updates-10_from_the_RPC?=
Archived-At: 
 <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/piIOX2cWE9t4p48CWZZDfX6ep_k>


--Apple-Mail=_05E2966C-A826-4CA0-8E60-91164BEE41D5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=utf-8

> On 12 Jul 2024, at 16:15, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@icann.org> wrote:
>=20
>> 3) Section 1.3 (not related to terminology)
>>=20
>> Current:
>>  The first RFC to be published following the guidance of the group of
>>  RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8650], published in November
>>  2019.=20
>>=20
>> Suggested (because the first RFC published was RFC 8651):=20
>> The first RFC (by date order) to be published following the the =
guidance of the group of
>> RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8651], published in October 2019.=20=

>>=20
>> Or:=20
>> The first RFC (by RFC number order) to be published following the the =
guidance of the group of
>> RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8650], published in November =
2019.
>=20
> Ouch. I (Paul) carefully checked this, but obviously did so =
incorrectly. We'll go with the first version (8651).

This might seem trivial, but I think it=E2=80=99s better to go with RFC =
number order, not date order, and therefore RFC 8650.  The reasoning is =
because it=E2=80=99s more important to tell people at what point in the =
series the formats change, not precisely when the change happened.

Jay

--=20
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@ietf.org


--Apple-Mail=_05E2966C-A826-4CA0-8E60-91164BEE41D5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=utf-8

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dutf-8"></head><body style=3D"overflow-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: =
after-white-space;"><div><blockquote type=3D"cite"><div>On 12 Jul 2024, =
at 16:15, Paul Hoffman &lt;paul.hoffman@icann.org&gt; =
wrote:</div><div><div><br><blockquote type=3D"cite">3) Section 1.3 (not =
related to terminology)<br><br>Current:<br> &nbsp;The first RFC to be =
published following the guidance of the group of<br> &nbsp;RFCs =
described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8650], published in November<br> =
&nbsp;2019. <br><br>Suggested (because the first RFC published was RFC =
8651): <br>The first RFC (by date order) to be published following the =
the guidance of the group of<br>RFCs described in [RFC7990] was =
[RFC8651], published in October 2019. <br><br>Or: <br>The first RFC (by =
RFC number order) to be published following the the guidance of the =
group of<br>RFCs described in [RFC7990] was [RFC8650], published in =
November 2019. <br></blockquote><br>Ouch. I (Paul) carefully checked =
this, but obviously did so incorrectly. We'll go with the first version =
(8651).<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This might seem =
trivial, but I think it=E2=80=99s better to go with RFC number order, =
not date order, and therefore RFC 8650. &nbsp;The reasoning is because =
it=E2=80=99s more important to tell people at what point in the series =
the formats change, not precisely when the change =
happened.</div><div><br></div><div>Jay</div></div><br><div>
<meta charset=3D"UTF-8"><div>--&nbsp;<br>Jay Daley<br>IETF Executive =
Director</div><div>exec-director@ietf.org</div>
</div>
<br></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_05E2966C-A826-4CA0-8E60-91164BEE41D5--