Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Fri, 30 September 2011 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD95B21F8B17 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.074, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_MILLIONSOF=0.315]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FEDpMOEser2B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:37:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E836421F8B05 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 17:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL2.acmepacket.com (10.0.0.22) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:40:17 -0400
Received: from MAIL1.acmepacket.com ([169.254.1.230]) by Mail2.acmepacket.com ([169.254.2.157]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 20:40:18 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
Thread-Index: AQHMfwmGBJpjUg7wrk6AbHnaTx82fQ==
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:40:17 +0000
Message-ID: <9723F40D-0889-4DCF-B44D-99E05A3EDC69@acmepacket.com>
References: <CAD5OKxtNjmWBz92bRuxka7e-BUpTPgVUvr3ahJGpmZ-U5nuPbQ@mail.gmail.com><CAD6AjGSmz5T_F+SK2EoBQm6T-iRKp7dd4j8ZAF5JKdbbyomZQA@mail.gmail.com><CALiegfmO54HC+g9L_DYn4jtXAAbLEvS++qxKa6TNrLDREs9SeA@mail.gmail.com><4E80984A.903@skype.net><CALiegfmyvTb57WVooKryS-ubfcg+w5gZ+zfO1zzBLn3609AzaA@mail.gmail.com>, <4E809EE6.2050702@skype.net>, <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510F1087@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <BLU152-W62B7F2AC3F0D5B6E277CB993F00@phx.gbl> <9790CEA7-59E6-4E14-9D5D-F9669E95036E@cisco.com> <02f701cc7efe$8b44b2f0$a1ce18d0$@us>
In-Reply-To: <02f701cc7efe$8b44b2f0$a1ce18d0$@us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.0.0.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4B6F367E73B9DA45B5C021CADFB8858B@acmepacket.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAWE=
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Requiring ICE for RTC calls
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:37:28 -0000

On Sep 29, 2011, at 7:21 PM, Richard Shockey wrote:

> RS> And at the rate this discussion is going it is reasonable to assume that
> it might be 10 years before RTCWEB might be able to reach consensus. But for
> what it's worth the end of POTS/PSTN is under active discussion. If for no
> other reason than the  backplanes of the 5E's and DMS 500's are literally
> cracking at a increasing pace. Remember 3G mobile networks still use TDM
> Switches. Bernard's point is well taken RTCWEB shouldn't worry about
> interconnection some gateway or border element will normalize that problem
> in some way shape or form. 

But it's not "POTS" that's really the point - it's the "PSTN".  From the perspective of this group, the "PSTN" is everything reachable through SIP service providers: every cell/mobile phone, DSL/Cablemodem MTA, PRI trunk, SIP Enterprise trunk, POTS landline, etc.  There are more of those right now than there are devices on the Internet.[1]  And way more of those than number of users and Web Browsers on the Internet.[2]

-hadriel

[1] Based on several sources which claim approx 5 Billion mobile phones, 1.2 Billion POTS lines, and hundreds of millions of MTAs, and untold number of PRI and SIP trunks; which I'm guesstimating totals about 7 Billion.  Compared to approx 5 Billion current devices on the Internet, according to www.imsresearch.com. (though they include things like printers and cameras in their counts)

[2] Based on ~2 Billion users, from www.internetworldstats.com and data.worldbank.org.