IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Something to do on Thursday

Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com> Wed, 13 March 2013 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6181B11E80F6 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.47
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.47 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.267, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fAZmBa7x-w3x for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from blu0-omc3-s23.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc3-s23.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.116.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2C411E80E9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:32:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLU403-EAS202 ([65.55.116.74]) by blu0-omc3-s23.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 12 Mar 2013 17:32:03 -0700
X-EIP: [JJ3DRVNl3C6Pb7bQDKdfikyiWx+BOyXr]
X-Originating-Email: [bernard_aboba@hotmail.com]
Message-ID: <BLU403-EAS2023F7DB1F50D631ADE62D893E30@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <A1EA44AE-F2BF-4B52-81CF-60B87FBA4805@acmepacket.com>
From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <A1EA44AE-F2BF-4B52-81CF-60B87FBA4805@acmepacket.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 20:32:01 -0400
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Mar 2013 00:32:03.0540 (UTC) FILETIME=[2F052940:01CE1F82]
Cc: "<rtcweb@ietf.org>" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Something to do on Thursday
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2013 00:32:14 -0000

It would be a better use of time than the video codec discussion, and might even yield a decision.

So yeah, it is a good idea, but no doubt one that will be ignored.

Bernard "someday they will have a museum for Hadriel's email posts (alongside Nostradamus predictions) and the masses will come in droves" Aboba

On Mar 12, 2013, at 16:46, "Hadriel Kaplan" <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> wrote:

> I will probably be blasted for this, but I'm feeling Goofy...
> 
> If we need something else to talk about on Thursday's RTCWeb meeting slot instead of video codecs, we can have the SRTP keying discussion that has been delayed so far.  I believe there are slide sets already prepared for both sides of the debate, and no IPR issues I know of.
> 
> -hadriel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email