Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail

Stefan Håkansson LK <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com> Mon, 22 August 2011 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA0421F8A7B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.965
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.965 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_36=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZpZNYL2qZvsA for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (mailgw9.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6661721F85B9 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 04:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb39-b7bfdae000005125-df-4e523b4c6662
Received: from esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw9.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 30.70.20773.C4B325E4; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:19:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [150.132.141.36] (153.88.115.8) by esessmw0256.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.137.0; Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:19:40 +0200
Message-ID: <4E523B4B.4070905@ericsson.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:19:39 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_H=E5kansson_LK?= <stefan.lk.hakansson@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ravindran Parthasarathi <pravindran@sonusnet.com>
References: <BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F16D@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se><4E3AB4D4.4070308@jesup.org>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A238@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F242@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A34F@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F245@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se>, <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA09BDB6A397@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><BBF498F2D030E84AB1179E24D1AC41D616C389F24A@ESESSCMS0362.eemea.ericsson.se><2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF510640D0@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com><A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA0B00FDABAD@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51064106@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC09801F1550D@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com> <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51064117@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <2E239D6FCD033C4BAF15F386A979BF51064117@sonusinmail02.sonusnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>, "public-webrtc@w3.org" <public-webrtc@w3.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:18:38 -0000

On 2011-08-22 10:16, Ravindran Parthasarathi wrote:

> ... Currently, let us have common understanding whether recording usecase has to be added in RTCWeb or not.
Agree. And also _which_ recording use case(s) in that case. I think this 
is what John was looking for when starting the thread.

My $0.02 says that we need to take some care before adding more and more 
usages and reqs - after all the schedules for the WGs are quite aggressive.
>
> Thanks
> Partha
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Avasarala, Ranjit [mailto:Ranjit.Avasarala@Polycom.com]
>> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:22 PM
>> To: Ravindran Parthasarathi; Elwell, John; Stefan Håkansson LK;
>> rtcweb@ietf.org; public-webrtc@w3.org
>> Subject: RE: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> We could use websockets protocol to pass metadata information.
>>
>> Regards
>> Ranjit
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Ravindran Parthasarathi
>> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 12:12 PM
>> To: Elwell, John; Stefan Håkansson LK; rtcweb@ietf.org; public-
>> webrtc@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>>
>> John,
>>
>> I agree with you. JavaScript API should have the provision to pass the
>> metadata.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Partha
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 11:59 AM
>>> To: Ravindran Parthasarathi; Stefan Håkansson LK; rtcweb@ietf.org;
>>> public-webrtc@w3.org
>>> Subject: RE: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>>>
>>> Partha,
>>>
>>> You are talking here about the metadata, I think. I assume the web page
>>> / JavaScript has to deal with that - not the browser.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Ravindran Parthasarathi [mailto:pravindran@sonusnet.com]
>>>> Sent: 19 August 2011 18:19
>>>> To: Stefan Håkansson LK; Elwell, John; rtcweb@ietf.org;
>>>> public-webrtc@w3.org
>>>> Subject: RE: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>>>>
>>>> Stefan,
>>>>
>>>> In case recording similar to SIPREC, it is little bit more
>>>> than spanning two media (RTP stream) alone because recording
>>>> has to include some context data about recording apart from
>>>> the media stream.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Partha
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>>>> Behalf Of Stefan Håkansson LK
>>>>> Sent: Friday, August 19, 2011 8:26 PM
>>>>> To: Elwell, John; rtcweb@ietf.org; public-webrtc@w3.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Use cases - recording and voicemail
>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I did suggest (in other text in my previous
>>>> message) that one
>>>>> possible solution might be to record locally and use a
>>>> second RTC-Web
>>>>> session to transmit from the local file to the>remote
>>>> recorder. What I
>>>>> failed to say was that in this case the local file would be
>>>> a temporary
>>>>> repository - just a buffer between the two sessions.
>>>>> This makes sense. Also, if you look at the API proposals
>>>> available, it
>>>>> would be quite easy to forward (in real time) a stream
>>>> being received
>>>>> to another entity. There is no explicit recording, a stream being
>>>>> received (via RTP) is just streamed to another entity (via
>>>> a separate
>>>>> RTC-Web session). I think this would solve this case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stefan
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> rtcweb mailing list
>>>>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> rtcweb mailing list
>> rtcweb@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb