IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti

"Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net> Wed, 27 February 2013 17:42 UTC

Return-Path: <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCFE21F87B3 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:42:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D8k5LwVYxSwJ for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (na01-by2-obe.ptr.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA7A21F8726 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:42:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BY2FFO11FD019.protection.gbl (10.1.15.202) by BY2FFO11HUB034.protection.gbl (10.1.14.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.12; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:42:34 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BY2FFO11FD019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.107) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.620.12 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:42:34 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.1.200]) by TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.7.153]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.003; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:41:51 +0000
From: "Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)" <matthew.kaufman@skype.net>
To: Randell Jesup <randell-ietf@jesup.org>, "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
Thread-Index: AQHOFExGxLgqgTDk7Uq8NoYnsLB7sZiMl0IAgAE+h4CAAA9jMA==
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:41:50 +0000
Message-ID: <AE1A6B5FD507DC4FB3C5166F3A05A484161F3279@TK5EX14MBXC273.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <C5E08FE080ACFD4DAE31E4BDBF944EB113404C31@xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com> <512D1B14.4080200@nostrum.com> <512E2647.9000109@jesup.org>
In-Reply-To: <512E2647.9000109@jesup.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.36]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(199002)(189002)(66066001)(31966008)(47736001)(46406002)(20776003)(54356001)(77982001)(46102001)(56816002)(47776003)(50986001)(50466001)(47446002)(74662001)(49866001)(33656001)(55846006)(23726001)(44976002)(47976001)(74502001)(4396001)(76482001)(59766001)(79102001)(56776001)(54316002)(51856001)(16406001)(53806001)(63696002)(80022001)(65816001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2FFO11HUB034; H:TK5EX14HUBC101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0770F75EA9
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Agenda time request for draft-dbenham-webrtcvideomti
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:42:51 -0000

Given that some vendors are certain they will not be shipping one, and other vendors are certain they will not be shipping the other, I'm not sure why we would have the discussion at all... but certainly *quality* isn't the axis they're using to make these decisions.

I think the draft is great *except* for the quality sections... remove those and we might be able to use it as a great jumping-off point for the actual conversation.

Matthew Kaufman

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email