IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Thu, 04 December 2014 22:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74CC1A6FDF for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:00:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.678
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.678 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BTYgjM9vzO8g for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qg0-f53.google.com (mail-qg0-f53.google.com [209.85.192.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A26B1A6FE1 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 14:00:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id q108so13203015qgd.40 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:00:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2fJCXnPOlxjds7rEY4vJaRrBJ7a/E58BDny2xZ28gaM=; b=YXzJmHTbQwI1ttOV6/CUzYF7ml2aWNi4M3AUWBn2LRzuUZoCp14ETT4VbRe3z2t8Bm p5/bTx0pbNzwrLllox2Rsyw7uzhp7clZ7xGAVSIY1jDBgoks4zG2YHkeRvsNEr/wo3PW PRjzIN+G1ScZMps5xh+6pqTHKsEmAFVfxFrxha92TLvbv+anXEBM+Klrqk8GNIlJ2u9y 4glIzflUpObTjjSE71UiEc9Oq3TXAOfH3hLYDGTcWAbxBoOSTaOPorsQK4pCHcr5pZ14 AIYtQmNGYTJBPkPM919VsR4AV+TKHdek5gtwUXRpMikfIPvvXObJ+V3hp7xhYUQxoCvN 2qFQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQll+d5jjCC/7PIpNffyrk+B5GFp9+fTRSOavrp4bmgT01W0yKApWTrCR6iKnwSYN3qfwd6B
X-Received: by 10.224.22.196 with SMTP id o4mr17661590qab.85.1417730420049; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 14:00:20 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.26.135 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 13:59:59 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com>
References: <547511DB.5050100@nostrum.com> <54759A4C.6020806@gmail.com> <5476092D.4010406@nostrum.com> <15EF2452-2C2C-420B-B972-C37EACE57850@apple.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:59:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegfkbiN1BAaJyrqOzUeYiViCGHcs6QaM7VVHwUzCUVAuKBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/-UtR9TYDso5G6g-OtuT0fjN8rWw
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Finishing up the Video Codec document, MTI (again, still, sorry)
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2014 22:00:31 -0000

2014-12-03 19:33 GMT+01:00 David Singer <singer@apple.com>:
> As I understand it, the recent face to face meeting decided to draft the requirement that WebRTC browsers be required to implement both VP8 and H.264, and get feedback on this, on the list.
>
> This is some feedback.

I've been searching in both the rtcweb and public-webrtc mailing
lists, and must say that it is VERY SAD that the only "contribution"
and "feedback" received from Apple are these regarding "MTI codecs",
nothing else.

I hope Apple has better things to do than sending FUD to working
groups in which they have no interest.



-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status