Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third parties [Was Re:Proposal for H.263 baseline codec]
"Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com> Wed, 04 April 2012 02:45 UTC
Return-Path: <paulej@packetizer.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEC511E809B for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:45:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.674
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.674 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.276, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_46=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZ0RVeab4qa4 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dublin.packetizer.com (dublin.packetizer.com [75.101.130.125]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930C011E8072 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sydney (rrcs-98-101-148-48.midsouth.biz.rr.com [98.101.148.48]) (authenticated bits=0) by dublin.packetizer.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q342joVR010555 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Apr 2012 22:45:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=packetizer.com; s=dublin; t=1333507551; bh=7QXvDCx8DNsBNdIKSSFv/Dm85yPU32VGohNW/uqEkvI=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bhrnYHSLbMuFs9SoqxNYZedfk5HjM0Oj+dQkKdLgckrVe0X9EEbWLVbiiPAnSHx7e fscfk9mHXAe6s9rOng/xalyGnKeyLuvRX8nRoiYNwROAcWYA97qbwx3SmW8VGwcC+0 V531xQZXSnUxxgiYEe09Fx5Yup8bu1ctK3VnpJBo=
From: "Paul E. Jones" <paulej@packetizer.com>
To: 'Serge Lachapelle' <sergel@google.com>, rtcweb@ietf.org
References: <CAMKM2Ly-xnVEciL941uOu1Bgwc-wssZ7HNkQuBhsCcgyqfuk5Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMKM2Ly-xnVEciL941uOu1Bgwc-wssZ7HNkQuBhsCcgyqfuk5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 22:45:56 -0400
Message-ID: <03ac01cd120d$0ffe95f0$2ffbc1d0$@packetizer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_03AD_01CD11EB.88EF66F0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQB2060nC5aqi+YrENoaiW0zV5P0Jpk2coDA
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third parties [Was Re:Proposal for H.263 baseline codec]
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 02:45:53 -0000
Will Google indemnify all implementers against any IPR claims? Do that, and I think the debate would be over. Paul From: rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:rtcweb-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Serge Lachapelle Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2012 1:55 PM To: rtcweb@ietf.org Subject: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third parties [Was Re:Proposal for H.263 baseline codec] [Forking the thread] Hello folks, Google confirms that the VP8 patent grant applies to both third-party hardware and software implementations of VP8. Google encourages the community to create hardware implementations of VP8, and has recently blogged about a number of new hardware implementations on the WebM blog ( http://blog.webmproject.org/2012/03/webm-gaining-momentum-in-hardware.html ). Google is quite proud of what the community has done with VP8 and looks forward to seeing more implementations of VP8 in both hardware and software. Regards, /Serge Lachapelle, Google, Stockholm On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 16:53, Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> wrote: On 3.29.2012 16:24 , "Basil Mohamed Gohar" <basilgohar@librevideo.org> wrote: >On 03/29/2012 10:20 AM, Stephan Wenger wrote: >> The second part of your sentence may or may not be true, depending on >>your >> relationship with google, your willingness to use the webm >>implementation >> in unchanged form, and other factors. Please see the webm license >> conditions, which AFAIK can be found here: >> http://www.webmproject.org/license/additional/ >Correct. I think you are referring to this part, explicitly: >> If you or your agent or exclusive licensee institute or order or agree >> to the institution of patent litigation against any entity (including >> a cross-claim or counterclaim in a lawsuit) alleging that this >> implementation of VP8 or any code incorporated within this >> implementation of VP8 constitutes direct or contributory patent >> infringement, or inducement of patent infringement, then any patent >> rights granted to you under this License for this implementation of >> VP8 shall terminate as of the date such litigation is filed. >Perhaps I assumed that that is a very reasonable part of the license. >That is, if you are suing someone alleging a patent infringement within >VP8, you are no longer granted the license to use VP8's patented >technologies that Google owns. Yes, that's one issue. Call it personal preference for different type of reciprocity conditions :-) (I could rant about it for hours, but let's continue to pretend that this is mostly a technical mailing list) The other issue, though (the fact that the license grant extends only to the VP8 implementation as provided by google, and does not extent to derivative works such as hardware implementations) should be moderately alarming even for an open source person. With respect to this clause, I will note that I criticized the licensing conditions in private and in public (IETF mike) several times, months ago, and nothing happened. Suggests to me one of three things: (1) google is a large company and decisions take time, or (2) google's legal is currently occupied with other stuff, or (3) that the choice of language is intentional, and intended to prevent forks. Take your pick. Stephan >_______________________________________________ >rtcweb mailing list >rtcweb@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb > _______________________________________________ rtcweb mailing list rtcweb@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb> Google Sweden AB | Kungsbron 2, SE-111 22 Stockholm | Org. nr. 556656-6880 Apparently, this footer is required in Europe. Apologies. This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else,please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks. -- Serge Lachapelle | Product Manager | sergel@google.com | +46 732 01 22 32 -- Serge Lachapelle | Product Manager | sergel@google.com | +46 732 01 22 32 Google Sweden AB | Kungsbron 2, SE-111 22 Stockholm | Org. nr. 556656-6880 Apparently, this footer is required in Europe. Apologies. This email may be confidential or privileged. If you received this communication by mistake, please don't forward it to anyone else,please erase all copies and attachments, and please let me know that it went to the wrong person. Thanks.
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third partie… Serge Lachapelle
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Serge Lachapelle
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Basil Mohamed Gohar
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Jean-Marc Valin
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Silvia Pfeiffer
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Dean Willis
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Randell Jesup
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Monty Montgomery
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Dean Willis
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Dean Willis
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Dean Willis
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Erik Lagerway
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Kevin P. Fleming
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Olle E. Johansson
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones
- Re: [rtcweb] Google VP8 Patent Grant for third pa… Paul E. Jones