Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process

Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <juberti@google.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD451AE199 for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:32:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.903
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.903 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u2OSH_sDZn1G for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:32:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ve0-x234.google.com (mail-ve0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::234]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38201AE04F for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:32:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ve0-f180.google.com with SMTP id jz11so333734veb.11 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:32:19 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Rj7D09FvkailcjEjq004uahvGN7vFhpWd+Y6nQFO0dA=; b=jRnVgWs4mAwB0s0E5Wq6zgAIfD0R/4cgM1yZvJZlxCgIvpBr85p2WEi71K5yv/qT1Z M3mvnu2r1DO4YOK78LyOca3UBAA9+j0JRsaxXnSkqtrcEWnKrXhKIaYXLT/M4arCV0fd zuOw4g+Ar3L5oufosp56l2CtoUeUpO+9aZpble8hMGGl4vnz5f0b9XqSl6gMdTHyp6LH 96lf5UP8JyF7QUmzN0Rh7cvp+LEzuIW0OurjIGneG3EF9tegEJUo6n7yGxL3M1OLSG72 ikgpb09NzhqWMY8LteWxNpBsUTTGmKWu8HVkEut7PFLxcJG/clSd6XtBauKDQujydqnE ZruQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Rj7D09FvkailcjEjq004uahvGN7vFhpWd+Y6nQFO0dA=; b=XWn8i9wvEG3DXN2WqIP4/hCJKx9tcASWgsVPx1DDh74RTVCUU1eJSvd4bZ1nUr56Ne HqX9zJ/+dDWT3cbact+OLvd5hPC+8IoTfe8sObwWWchFjy2DML7yLew3FwKm4PVGftwH /APrbWk6p2HbmtLStK1EeX/PqwdSCa4Vwq1BIwqjXP5fb+OMDxp7Up3APRk0c96jm+me jq/DxL7XAOs4RJFHL440Ba8Fno3pf/KUC0bkfbVq8ZiRor3m4pjmrV1zN9sH/NHTQOwA cgvI/xr4lt+0pXIvV7kMrQCJqiDG5eCj50EnqqFLcuL15b+3KhxXEjXZEevp1m90fAFU pO2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8jjzkOgc4kI3CWIpLyOQ26QFumFgp57AGYcsyzWiknrYPu10Hq8lLVVYxIeaQ0ELIAAcHCMQDhUsH+bPbSy+UQC3tNEKvJm6C4uYcgoKAoXKJ8IyJmI9ybYRrbqS/X2Tt/gemBX0JILKq+45yB7See0Q3nfO0W+iV0hmpK7O4PmXzgbftRv52SHohBpUhaPm0DjZX
X-Received: by 10.52.28.243 with SMTP id e19mr269589vdh.36.1385073139567; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:32:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.110.101 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:31:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3249225E-6709-4022-88CF-75020C1A4CEC@iii.ca>
References: <528E69E2.9020208@librevideo.org> <7949EED078736C4881C92F656DC6F6C130EA8AD7E0@ausmsex00.austin.kmvtechnologies.com> <CAOJ7v-151K2UoeMOhY-UUDzZwE=89qzbAQdrhQXYb72W+ZxQOw@mail.gmail.com> <3249225E-6709-4022-88CF-75020C1A4CEC@iii.ca>
From: Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 14:31:58 -0800
Message-ID: <CAOJ7v-3ruj91wd=1_TUevapamLxNJ93Ukd=VU+Gq7Q19YTvc+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf307d069278e9b604ebb778f1
Cc: "rtcweb@ietf.org" <rtcweb@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] Proposed Video Selection Process
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 22:32:28 -0000

Even the proposal that recommended H.264 as MTI indicated that the
technical merit of the currently proposed codecs is equivalent, and the
fundamental question is IPR.
http://tools.ietf.org/agenda/88/slides/slides-88-rtcweb-8.pdf

Put another way, if the alleged IPR issues associated with either H.264 or
VP8 disappeared overnight, this discussion would be instantly over.


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>; wrote:

>
> On Nov 21, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Justin Uberti <juberti@google.com>; wrote:
>
> > That said, I think the general understanding here is that this is no
> longer a technical decision.
> >
>
> I'll note that some people strongly disagree with this is not a technical
> decision but there are others who do think it is is no longer a technical
> decision.
>
> _______________________________________________
> rtcweb mailing list
> rtcweb@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb
>