Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb Digest, Vol 38, Issue 51
Steev James <steev.a.james@gmail.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 04:40 UTC
Return-Path: <steev.a.james@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559EA1A070F for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qKA0jOLc5hqV for <rtcweb@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qg0-x230.google.com (mail-qg0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41591A070B for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id q108so6321262qgd.21 for <rtcweb@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=wX5Ed2dAJlsyqta+ntpk7W0tSgMpHbBfvhbb7zRwjXU=; b=hZtMmSnaq9BJyWZ882OAntWJyJRZL9YQUtxO84wWw0l0jlkdUCYd7HD+0OPI4Ju2n2 JHXcqhwqJE/v7fwP6zN1KN6ut6408ZBAbNVKLB3o5dYGg4kgOD+lLNdsDgiGU0kW5QmF 5muS7XlbW2xZd6e8GenUHltF/MdhaJn8wwmPzJyGZ1YpCjBkDneAabhu3xxPLW6oNZJe z2u5M6blAOQZS2P2KpP8LveYXVZGK1CasWdbZVt6jFcyi1BG4xqsoQcxYYj2ZJsVPTnu SLaruQYubANWyTQjTgGrQmmSsa9FGiWHhPEAIkUt65JjB9TIm2adulrQfcuTZfUOY5+M 5JdQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.82.229 with SMTP id h92mr26287745qgd.51.1398660008283; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.30.98 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Apr 2014 21:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <mailman.2.1398538803.23199.rtcweb@ietf.org>
References: <mailman.2.1398538803.23199.rtcweb@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 10:10:08 +0530
Message-ID: <CAB1_PA6doq_SqGQ7BiveM_9rPyeezxtQ2pk4s3P3rHiQN+dy5Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Steev James <steev.a.james@gmail.com>
To: rtcweb@ietf.org, coverdale@sympatico.ca, jmvalin@mozilla.com, "kiran.guduru@samsung.com" <kiran.guduru@samsung.com>, cary.bran@plantronics.com
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c12366f4922a04f812e8fa"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtcweb/-dmkQWv8czh2Spcjq_SAIO1ipzk
Subject: Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb Digest, Vol 38, Issue 51
X-BeenThere: rtcweb@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Real-Time Communication in WEB-browsers working group list <rtcweb.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rtcweb/>
List-Post: <mailto:rtcweb@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/rtcweb>, <mailto:rtcweb-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 04:40:10 -0000
Paul, What do you say, if another end point is using both G.711 and Opus at 8kHz and why ? Steev. >> Is that means spec is recommending G.711 (PCMA/PCMU) for sampling rate > >> less than or equal to 8 kHz? > > > >No. Opus is still a good idea for 8 kHz, but it's not 2119 RECOMMENDED > >since there are valid (mostly complexity-related) reasons to use G.711 > >despite the higher bit-rate. > > > > Jean-Marc > > Opus isn't a good idea for 8 KHz if you are trying to inter-operate with > another end-point using G.711. > > ...Paul > > >
- Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb Digest, Vol 38, Issue 51 Steev James
- Re: [rtcweb] rtcweb Digest, Vol 38, Issue 51 Jean-Marc Valin